Примеры использования Programme budget should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Negotiations on the proposed programme budget should be open, transparent and inclusive.
The programme budget should also reflect the various mandates assigned by the competent intergovernmental legislative bodies.
Ideally, this would be part of the printed and approved programme budget, should that approach be agreed.
Negotiations regarding the programme budget should be open, transparent and inclusive, and should seek to avoid past mistakes.
Member States should question whether the resources under the 2010-2011 programme budget should be carried over automatically.
Люди также переводят
The resources requested in the programme budget should conform to the legislative mandates established by the principal and subsidiary organs.
In the event that the assumptions on which the budget is based are not realized in 2004, or if the Court does not commence investigations,then the Committee expected that the programme budget should be significantly underspent.
Paragraph 25.17 of the proposed programme budget should therefore be amended to reflect the separate nature of the two activities.
With regard to the recommendation of the Committee contained in paragraph 32 of its report that the allocation for salaries of judges be reduced by 20 per cent,reflecting a more likely estimate of the costs involved, the Assembly expressed the view that the allocation as originally proposed in the draft programme budget should be retained, and decided accordingly.
A clearly spelled out follow-up mechanism and a revised programme budget should integrate the follow-up processes.
The programme budget should be viewed in combination with the proposed support budget for UNDCP covering the same period as presented in document E/CN.7/1999/17.
Finally, the Group emphasized that negotiations regarding the programme budget should be open, transparent, inclusive and avoid past mistakes.
The programme budget should, however, deal only with activities mandated in the medium-term plan and should not reflect policy issues that had not yet been discussed by the legislative bodies.
At the same time, it is evident that the programme of work approved in the programme budget should be used as the basis from which individual work plans are derived.
Future proposals for the programme budget should reflect an increased focus on results, not just in terms of programme delivery but also in terms of the efficiency with which approved resources were utilized.
The Organization's budget had increased significantly in recent years and,while the European Union did not question the principle that the programme budget should reflect a resource level commensurate with mandates, it seemed that no serious effort had been made to find further efficiencies.
The unified Annual Programme Budget should remain the framework for the activities of the Office, thereby ensuring transparency, cohesiveness and accountability for all activities undertaken in support of those of concern to the Office;
It will be recalled that, under the procedure established by the General Assembly in its resolution 41/213 of 19 December 1986,additional expenditures proposed over and above those in the programme budget should be accommodated within a contingency fund, established each biennium to accommodate additional expenditures derived from the legislative mandates not provided for in the proposed programme budget. .
Proposed add-ons to the programme budget should be limited to new mandates that truly could not be achieved within the approved budget; the current ICT proposals did not respond to a new mandate from the General Assembly and should have been included in the budget proposal.
Mr. Schlesinger( Austria), speaking on behalf of the European Union, the associated countries Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and, in addition, Liechtenstein and Norway,said that annex I to General Assembly resolution 41/213 clearly stated that the programme budget should include expenditures related to political activities of a“ perennial” character whose mandates were renewed annually.
He recalled that the General Assembly had also requested that the programme budget should better reflect priorities and should contain enough information for Member States to take well-informed decisions.
Furthermore, although the programme budget should reflect Member States' priorities in the areas of development, peace and security, and human rights, there were disproportionate increases in the resources allocated to some sections of the proposed programme budget for 2010-2011, and his delegation emphasized the need to allocate adequate resources to development activities.
It will be recalled that, under the procedure established by the General Assembly in its resolution 41/213 of 19 December 1986,additional expenditures proposed over and above those in the programme budget should be accommodated within a contingency fund established at 0.75 per cent of the preliminary estimate of resources for the biennium 1994-1995, recosted at 1994-1995 rates General Assembly resolution 47/213.
The work of the Working Party on the Medium-term Plan and the Programme Budget should be coordinated and synchronized with the work of the relevant bodies at United Nations Headquarters, in New York, in order to ensure that the views of the Working Party are taken fully into account.
Decisions by substantive legislative bodies requesting new publication(s),subsequent to those approved in the programme budget, should be taken only after the careful review of, among other things, information on the potential for duplication and financial implications, and a time-frame should be incorporated.
The use of those elements in the context of the medium-term plan and the programme budget should be flexible and carried out in a manner that did not create important differences between the programmes that could prejudge their relevance in the context of the budgeting and evaluation process.
General Assembly resolutions 50/214 and 50/231 contained contradictory and incompatible expectations: both current andnew activities must be implemented without additional appropriations; the programme budget should be reduced from $2.76 billion to $2.6 billion without affecting the full implementation of mandated programmes; additional mandates of an unforeseen nature must be implemented within existing resources, and the Secretary-General should submit proposals on possible means of absorption.
In preparation for the transition to IPSAS,the Committee considers that the performance reports on the programme budget should provide a more meaningful analysis of the trends and final level of unliquidated obligations, as well as of the factors that prevented disbursement of obligations in the financial period during which the corresponding expenditures were incurred.
The Advisory Committee recalls General Assembly resolutions 41/213 and 42/211, according to which the programme budget should include a contingency fund expressed as a percentage of the overall budget level, to accommodate additional expenditures relating to the biennium derived from legislative mandates not provided for in the proposed programme budget. .
Programme budgeting should be- for both Member States and the Secretary-General- a key instrument for priority-setting, for adapting the Organization to changing requirements.