Примеры использования Public executives на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The public and public executives cannot do this separately.
The responsibility for active decision making will remain with elected and appointed public executives.
They are no longer able to guilt their public executives for wrong directions.
Public executives would be continually aware of social change as it occurs.
They yearn for a return to the quality relationship their great grandparents had with their congressional public executives.
In time, public executives will see their positions as one to be of concurrence with the public. .
They yearn for a return to the quality relationship their great grandparents had with their congressional public executives.
Doing so, the public becomes co-responsible with their public executives for the survival, existence, and sustainability of their communities and nation.
That would be as destructive as the immorality andunethical behavior of citizens and public executives in the current time.
As citizens or public executives, we can never really escape our humanity, our fear of the untested and the need to bolster our flagging egos.
As there are today military universities for the training,the future will see the development of universities to train our public executives.
These innovations would provide an ongoing educational function to the public and to help public executives keep their finger on the"pulse" of social change of their respective constituencies.
What has come about is a natural consequence of the diminished role of the public to participate in the option-development andchoice-making of those options with their public executives.
National, state, and provincial policy-makers, public executives, and administrators are simply flying by the seat of their pants hoping against hope that"SHTF"* does not happen during their term in office or in their career.
When the awareness of the full set of these values becomes known, private,corporate, and public executives will choose to use them.
National, state, and provincial policy-makers, public executives, and administrators are simply flying by the seat of their pants hoping against hope that"SHTF" 20 does not happen during their term in office or in their career.
There is a partyism of"us with us," that eventually the public sees themselves as co-participants with their public executives in much more real ways.
Offer a means for public executives to receive ongoing feedback from constituents; and keep pace with social change and the ever-changing hierarchies of needs of citizens whose interpretations of the six core values of social sustainability are constantly evolving.
There is obviously a great need by the public that needs to be filled for their ability to communicate effectively with their public executives, whether those are elected or appointed.
The cause that compounds the grievance citizens feel today(2015)toward their government in general, and public executives in particular, did not come about by a malicious and deliberate intention by members of Congress, but rather as an unanticipated consequence of the Apportionment Act of 1911.
You are now also seeing developed and maturing democracies that need the same kind of adaptability so thatindividuals become more responsible in their own governance along with their public executives.
It is simply impossible to accomplish with state and congressional legislative processes willingly neutered andincompetent by their elected and appointed public executives who seek money, vast amounts of money, to become elected or re-elected; and, to assure that more money follows by"Yessing" their moneyed contributors.
Offer an inventive way to engage contemporary technologies to give citizens a means of offering their collective intelligence to create a"trend" of consensus to share with their public executives.
We would suggest that at least a 3-tiered means of decision-making be involved:One is voting for public executives and particular ballot options where the public is involved, such as in referendum issues, and that there be another at least two different levels of decision-making recognized where citizen input is necessary.
The irony of this situation is that as the ability of citizens to influence their representative decreased the capability of citizens to communicate with their elected and appointed public executives increased as robustly.
Just as the dialogue between the patient and doctor is immediate,in a REALITY DEMOCRACY the"dialogue" between the public and their public executives is ongoing and immediate in"real time," not as it is now.
Offer an inventive way to engage contemporary technologies to give citizens an ongoing andcontinuous means of offering their collective intelligence to create a"trend" of intelligent consensus to share with their public executives.
In fact, because we have not had stable, consistent, timeless, irreducible, and universally applicable criteria for estimating the relative change of conditions of our nation, andits people collectively and individually, our public executives have been unable to plan effectively for the changes that will engulf us as we move into the future decades.
What is missing from this technological development is an innovative social process that substantively adds something to the democratic process that hasnot existed outside of the town hall meeting and letters to citizen's public executives.
In a democratic nation, where the right of self-determination by its citizens has become a part of their cultural heritage and way of life for centuries, and where there is no adequate democratic process for individuals, their communities and their national society to share their preferences and opinions, andwhere their elected and appointed public executives do not solicit those preferences and opinions, surely that situation becomes more dire with each passing decade.