Примеры использования Responsible international organization на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Under any dispute settlement procedure applicable between it and the responsible international organization;
Paragraph 3 does not apply if the responsible international organization fails to implement the dispute settlement procedures in good faith.
Satisfaction shall not be out of proportion to the injury andmay not take a form humiliating to the responsible international organization.
A form of satisfaction intended to humiliate the responsible international organization may be unlikely, but is not unimaginable.
The responsible international organization is under an obligation to make full reparation for the injury caused by the internationally wrongful act.
Resort to countermeasures by an injured international organization against a responsible international organization is certainly a rare event.
The conduct that the responsible international organization should take in order to cease the wrongful act, if it is continuing;
The rules of the organization may affect the admissibility of countermeasures in the relations between a responsible international organization and its members.
This implies the entitlement to claim from the responsible international organization compliance with the obligations that are set out in Part Three.
Under any dispute settlement procedure applicable between the injured State orinternational organization and the responsible international organization;
Notify the responsible international organization of any decision to take countermeasures and offer to negotiate with that organization. .
Chapter II considers countermeasures taken in order to induce the responsible international organization to cease the unlawful conduct and to provide reparation.
The responsible international organization may not rely on its rules as justification for failure to comply with its obligations under this Part.
The present article sets out the principle that the responsible international organization is required to make full reparation for the injury caused.
Non-performance of international obligations may be justified as a countermeasure only insofar as it is directed against a responsible international organization.
Countermeasures shall be terminated as soon as the responsible international organization has complied with its obligations under Part Two in relation to the internationally wrongful act.
A State or an international organization entitled to invoke responsibility under paragraphs 1 to 3 may claim from the responsible international organization.
Two different questions arise with regard to measures that may be taken against a responsible international organization by a State or international organization which is not injured within the meaning of article 46.
There seemed to be no reason for excluding, in general terms,that an injured State could take countermeasures against a responsible international organization.
The responsible international organization is thus given an opportunity to appraise the claim made by the injured State or international organization and become aware of the risk of being the target of countermeasures.
Any State orinternational organization entitled to invoke responsibility under the preceding paragraphs may claim from the responsible international organization.
These instances from practice confirm that injured States may generally take countermeasures against a responsible international organization under the same conditions applying to countermeasures against a responsible State.
In fact, practice does not offer examples of countermeasures takenby non-injured States or international organizations against a responsible international organization.
While paragraph 1 refers to the responsible international organization as"another international organization", this does not mean that, when the entity invoking responsibility is a State, more than one international organization needs to be involved.
It also agreed that there was no subsidiary obligation for members to make reparation when the responsible international organization was not in a position to do so.
Some States specifically endorsed article 35, which affirms that a responsible international organization cannot rely, in its relations to a non-member, on the rules of the organization as justification for its failure to comply with one of its obligations under international law.
The principles embodied in these articles appear to be equally relevant when an injured State orinternational organization takes countermeasures against a responsible international organization.
As a result, Part Three of the present draft articles encompasses obligations that a responsible international organization may have towards one or more other organizations, one or more States, or the international community as a whole.
Countermeasures are limited to the non-performance for the time being of international obligations of the State orinternational organization taking the measures towards the responsible international organization.
Moreover, a uniform regime of the questions dealt with in these articles,whether they are taken against a responsible State or a responsible international organization, would have a practical advantage.