Примеры использования Review mechanism should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The review mechanism should.
Underlines that any such review mechanism should.
The review mechanism should be funded by voluntary contributions.
As set out in Conference resolutions 1/1 and 2/1, the review mechanism should.
The review mechanism should therefore be balanced to address these issues.
The following components of the review mechanism should have the following functions.
The review mechanism should be based on a simple system of collecting data Slovakia.
In the resolution, the Conference underlined that any such review mechanism should.
The review mechanism should assess the status of implementation of the Convention by.
We recognize that it is up to the governments to decide how the review mechanism should be organized.
The review mechanism should combine self-assessments with group and expert reviews. .
With respect to the mandate of the review mechanism, it is proposed that the review mechanism should do the following.
Therefore, the review mechanism should be owned and embraced by developed and developing countries;
Also in the same resolution, the Conference of the States Parties underlined that any such review mechanism should.
In addition, the review mechanism should serve to identify and disseminate best practices.
Furthermore, China and Colombia emphasized that a review mechanism should respect the principle of State sovereignty.
Thus, the review mechanism should operate according to balanced, transparent and objective assessment criteria.
Any decision on the recommendations concerning the review mechanism should be taken by the participating States by consensus.
The review mechanism should be based on collecting data, carrying out site visits and conducting face-to-face meetings.
The General Assembly had stressed that the review mechanism should complement and not duplicate the work of the treaty bodies.
The review mechanism should identify, at the earliest stage possible, difficulties encountered and best practices implemented by States parties in the fulfilment of their obligations under the Convention.
The Conference may wish to consider that such a review mechanism should also be cost-effective, complete and user-friendly.
The review mechanism should make use of information gained on anti-corruption legislation and practice by GRECO and the OECD Working Group on Bribery, with the aim of avoiding duplication of work.
As such, discussion of the review mechanism should have high priority on the agenda of the Conference.
The review mechanism should base its reports only on information provided by the States parties(and, where appropriate, by signatory States) on the status of implementation in their respective countries.
Several speakers noted that the review mechanism should be funded from the regular budget of the United Nations.
Over time, the review mechanism should also make it possible to identify areas where improvements and training are needed.
The Conference underlined that any such review mechanism should be transparent, efficient, non-intrusive, inclusive and impartial.
They felt that the review mechanism should be tailored to the specific scope and objectives of the Organized Crime Convention.
Many speakers stressed that a review mechanism should be based on the principles contained in Conference resolution 5/5.