Примеры использования Right in tangible на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Law applicable to a security right in tangible assets.
That is, conflict-of-laws rules relating to obligations(for example, not only sales and leases, but also licences and receivables)may differ from those applicable to agreements creating a security right in tangible assets.
Law applicable to a security right in tangible property.
The law should provide that a security right in tangible assets may be made effective against third parties by registration as provided in recommendation 32 or by the secured creditor's possession.
Moreover, until recently, in many States it was not possible for a buyer to grant a non-possessory security right in tangible assets, even to a seller.
Люди также переводят
Hence, many States provide that a security right in tangible assets will automatically pass into the proceeds of its disposition.
It should also be noted that registration in the intellectual property registry would normally refer only to a security right in intellectual property andnot to a security right in tangible assets with respect to which intellectual property is used.
Hence, many States provide that a security right in tangible property will automatically pass into the proceeds of its disposition.
Conversely, if the security right in tangible assets is made effective against third parties before attachment and is registered in the immovable registry, it will have priority over subsequently registered security rights in the immovable property see recommendations 84 and 85.
It was stated that the exception referred to a security right in tangible property other than inventory for instance, equipment.
Conversely, if the security right in tangible property is made effective against third parties before attachment and is registered in the immovable registry it will have priority over subsequently registered security rights in the immovable property see A/CN.9/631, recommendations 93 and 94.
As discussed in the chapter on the creation of a security right, an ordinary security right in tangible assets will normally extend into the proceeds of its disposition see recommendation 19.
The law should provide that an acquisition security right in tangible property that is to become an attachment to immovable property, registered in the immovable property registry within[specify a short time period, such as 20-30 days] days after the tangible property became an attachment, has priority as against an existing encumbrance in the related immovable property other than an encumbrance securing a loan financing the construction of the immovable property.
As discussed in chapter IV(Creation of a security right(effectiveness as between the parties)),an ordinary security right in tangible property will normally extend into the proceeds of its disposition see A/CN.9/631, recommendation 18.
The law should provide that a security right in tangible property may be made effective against third parties by registration as provided in recommendation 33 or through transfer of possession to the secured creditor.
It was also noted that, if sellers or financial lessors failed to register a notice in the general security rights registry within the relevant grace period, they would obtain a normal security right to which thegeneral priority rules would apply that is to say, priority of a security right in tangible property other than inventory would be achieved as of the time of registration of a notice with respect to the security right, which would be after the expiry of the grace period.
The law should provide that,if an acquisition security right in tangible assets is effective against third parties, the security right in proceeds has the priority of a non-acquisition security right. .
The law should provide that a buyer orlessee may create a security right in tangible property that is the object of a retention-of-title right or a financial lessor's right. .
Ss"Possessory security right" means a security right in tangible property that is in the actual possession of the secured creditor or of another person(other than the debtor or other grantor) holding the asset for the benefit of the secured creditor;
For example, almost all States provide for the continuance of the"pledge" idea in the sense that a security right in tangible property may be made effective against third parties by a transfer of possession of the pledged asset to the secured creditor.
The law should provide that, if a security right in tangible property is effective against third parties at the time when the tangible property becomes an attachment, the security right remains effective against third parties thereafter.
For the reasons set out in chapter IV(see A/CN.9/631/Add.1, paras…),this Guide recommends that a security right in tangible assets that are later processed or commingled automatically continues in the finished product or commingled mass see A/CN.9/631, recommendation 23.
The law should provide that a security right in tangible property made effective against third parties by possession of a negotiable document has priority over a competing security right made effective against third parties by another method.
It was widely felt that,for the same reasons the Guide provided for an acquisition security right in tangible assets, the draft Supplement should provide for an acquisition security right in intellectual property or a licence of intellectual property.
The law should provide that, if a security right in tangible property is effective against third parties when it becomes part of a mass or product, the security right that continues in the mass or product, as provided in recommendation 23, is effective against third parties.
Mr. Cohen(United States of America) said that the result of the discussions had been a general recognition, with a limited exception,of the principle that a party that had a security right in tangible property represented by a negotiable document and that had made that security right effective against third parties by possession of the document would have priority over a competing secured party that had a security right made effective by other means.
An acquisition financing transaction exists wherever one person may claim a property right in tangible property to secure another person's obligation to pay any unpaid portion of the purchase price(or its economic equivalent), whether that right exists in favour of a seller, a lessor or a lender.
Acquisition security right", in the context of both the unitary and the non-unitary approach to acquisition financing rights, means a security right in tangible property other than negotiable instruments or negotiable documents that secures the obligation to pay any unpaid portion of the purchase price of the property or an obligation incurred or credit otherwise provided to enable the grantor to acquire the property.