Примеры использования Several other representatives на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Several other representatives concurred with her views.
The representative of Argentina noted that Argentina needed to be removed from table 1, and several other representatives suggested that further modifications to the proposal be considered.
Several other representatives expressed support for the draft decision.
Responding, the representative of the United States and several other representatives expressed disappointment that the representative was blocking adoption of the draft decision, given that he had not participated in the informal group, where clear explanations of the rationale for the decision had been given and where he could have voiced his concerns and joined discussions on ways to address them, as other participants with reservations had done.
Several other representatives also endorsed the proposed guidelines.
Several other representatives reserved their position on the percentage levels.
Several other representatives referred to the strong connection between health and land.
Several other representatives stressed the importance of HCFC phase-out during the replenishment period.
Several other representatives took the view that national law was of some relevance in the current context.
Several other representatives suggested that a framework combining binding and voluntary approaches should be employed.
Several other representatives also stressed the importance of promoting the key objectives in the Strategic Approach.
Several other representatives opposed that suggestion, affirming that it would undermine the equality of States before the law.
Several other representatives supported the suggestion noting that the heavy agenda of MBTOC made onerous demands on the temporary co-chairs.
Several other representatives, however, while sympathizing with Bangladesh's predicament, expressed misgivings at the Committee's suggested draft decision.
Several other representatives, speaking in favour of the proposal, said that it offered an opportunity to reap climate co-benefits from the HCFC phase-out.
Several other representatives supported the suggestion that the Multilateral Fund should assist countries through funding the destruction of banks of ozone-depleting substances.
Several other representatives said that they supported option 2, drawing attention to the inherent links between provisions on national implementation plans and those on reporting.
Several other representatives, however, expressed the view that the obligation to comply with the provisions of the instrument was not contingent on the receipt of particular types or amounts of assistance.
Supported by several other representatives, he stressed that as the Quick Start Programme would end in 2013 a solution for longterm financing was needed as soon as possible.
Supported by several other representatives, he endorsed the approach outlined in document SAICM/ICCM.2/INF/18 on possible guidelines for the identification of new activities for inclusion in the Plan.
Several other representatives drew attention to a potential policy issue of having to provide such notice to non-governmental organizations. Some representatives and expressed a reservation to the proposed amendment.
Several other representatives said that there was a need for a transparent dialogue aimed at developing more realistic projections of the budgetary resources available and encouraging a broader donor base.
Several other representatives drew attention to measures that had been implemented in recent years in their countries and at the subregional and regional levels to deal with mercury-related risks and to phase out the use of mercury.
Several other representatives then argued against establishing a contact group, saying that to do so in the absence of consensus was contrary to the previous practice of the Montreal Protocol and might set an unfortunate precedent.
Several other representatives, while recognizing the importance of the ongoing work at IMO, highlighted the contributions to be made by the Basel Convention, for instance on the reporting mechanism and environmentally sound management.
Several other representatives suggested that the paragraph should also contain a reference to the Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, while others considered that that would be inappropriate since the latter Convention was not yet in force.
Several other representatives, however, maintained their countries' opposition, saying that there was no clear scientific proof of the toxicity of chrysotile asbestos to human health and suggesting that the Committee had not fully followed the requisite procedures.
Several other representatives noted the benefits of decentralization, political equity and regionalization; one of these expressed a preference for co-locating the permanent secretariat with other related secretariats in a developing country.
Several other representatives called for efforts to make greater use of the experience gained under other multilateral environmental agreements concerned with illegal trade such as the Basel Convention and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Several other representatives argued for the prioritization of major mercury uses, focusing on those involving the greatest quantities of mercury and causing the most harm, while others called for an outright ban on all new mercury-containing products and processes using mercury.