Примеры использования Talić на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Brđanin and Talić.
The case against Brđanin/Talić started on 23 January 2002.
Brđanin and Talić.
On 8 December 2000, Talić filed a motion for provisional release.
Brdjanin and Talić.
On 5 May 2000, Momir Talić filed a motion seeking the disqualification of Judge Mumba.
Iii Brđanin and Talić.
The Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić(IT-99-36-PT), two accused:Brđanin and Talić.
Momir Talić was arrested on 25 August 1999 and transferred to the Detention Unit the same day.
In Trial Chamber II, trial proceedings are ongoing in the Simić,the Brđanin/Talić and the Stakić cases.
Brdjanin, Talić, Galić, Vasiljević and Krajišnik had been charged on sealed indictments.
At the beginning of the reporting period, this case proceeded against both Radislav Brđanin and Momir Talić.
Those orders addressed Talić and Brđanin's respective objections to the form of the indictment.
On 1 February 2000, the Trial Chamber rejected motions by the accused, Momir Talić, to dismiss the indictment, and again for his release.
Talić was arrested on 25 August 1999 and also pleaded not guilty to all charges at his initial appearance on 31 August 1999.
Brđanin filed his pre-trial brief on 16 November 2001 and Talić filed his pre-trial brief on 20 November 2001 pursuant to rule 65 ter F.
Aside from preparing several cases, Trial Chamber II rendered a judgement in the Krnojelac case and opened the Vasiljević,Brđanin/Talić, Simić and Stakić trials.
On 23 October 2002, the case The Prosecutor v. Momir Talić(IT-99-36/1-T) was retained in Trial Chamber II, composed of Judges Schomburg(presiding), Mumba and Agius.
The case remained suspended and adjourned sine die pending a change in the accused Talić's health.On 28 May 2003, Talić passed away.
In addition, the Austrian authorities arrested Momir Talić in Vienna, while Vinko Martinović and Mladen Naletilić were both transferred to The Hague from Croatia at the request of the Prosecutor.
In July 2001, at the request of the Prosecutor, the Chambers ordered the unsealing of an indictment and the warrant of arrest of Stojan Zupljanin,a co-accused of Radoslav Brđanin and Momir Talić.
The case is closely related to that of Brđanin and Talić and relates to the alleged role of Mr. Stakić in the"ethnic cleansing" of non-Serbs from the Prijedor Municipality.
In response to the discussions during the rule 65 ter(I) meeting, on 18 February 2002,the Prosecutor filed a motion to take depositions from 10 witnesses common to the Brđanin and Talić and Stakić cases.
General Talić and Mr. Brđanin are accused of having participated in a joint criminal enterprise relating to the"ethnic cleansing" of non-Serbs from the Autonomous Region of Krajina.
During the biennium until March 2003, the Prosecutor has been engaged in prosecuting seven trials(Bosanski Samac;Brdanin/Talić; Tuta/Štela; Galić; Vasiljević; Stakić; and Milošević) involving 12 accused.
As commander of the 5th Corps/1st Krajina Corps,Momir Talić had the authority to direct and control the actions of all forces assigned to the 5th Corps/1st Krajina Corps or within his control.
The Office of the Prosecutor was actively engaged in prosecuting seven trials(Kordić/Čerkez, Kupreskić, Jelisić, Blaškić, Kunarac, Kvočka and Krstić) and in preparing an additional nine trials Boseki Šamac, Keraterm Camp, Krnojelac,Brdjanin/Talić, Tuta/Stela, Galić, Vasiljević, Krajišnik and Nikolić.
The Prosecutor was engaged in prosecuting eight trials during the reporting period Bosanski Šamac involving four accused; Kolundžija et al.;Brđanin/Talić; Martinović/Naletilić; Galić; Vasiljević; Stakić; and Milošević cases which is proceeding on three indictments-- Kosovo, Croatia and Bosnia.
On 1 December 1999, the accused Momir Talić applied for his release on the basis, inter alia, that the indictment did not disclose a prima facie case and that he did not know the nature of the charges against him. On 10 December 1999, the Trial Chamber dismissed his request, declaring his detention to be lawful.
Additionally, the Pre-Trial Judge andthe parties discussed various means by which witnesses who were common to both the Stakić case and the Brđanin and Talić case would not have to testify on two different occasions before the International Tribunal in the two cases.