Примеры использования Use of electronic signatures на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Use of electronic signatures in international and domestic transactions.
In the context of e-commerce, parties will frequently make use of electronic signatures.
These and other relevant concepts(e.g.,system access rules, use of electronic signatures and documents in payment and settlement systems) should be addressed through NBT regulations.
Advances had also recently been made in some countries in adopting legislation allowing the use of electronic signatures.
The EU Directive on Electronic Signatures facilitates the use of electronic signatures and contributes to their legal recognition.
Her delegation was of the view that the uniform rules should not seek to over-regulate the use of electronic signatures.
In general, the Ministry of Finance bill essentially allows the use of electronic signatures on the basis of the already established framework.
As a supplement to the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce,the new Model Law is intended to provide essential principles for facilitating the use of electronic signatures.
The present document analyses the main legal issues arising out of the use of electronic signatures and authentication methods in international transactions.
The view was expressed that technical interoperability, while it constituted a desirable objective,should not be regarded as a theoretical prerequisite for cross-border use of electronic signatures.
Encourage the development andavailability of low-cost software tools for use of electronic signatures or other security technologies.
OECD Member countries support the use of electronic signatures as equivalent to handwritten signatures and advocate technology neutrality in their use. .
New Zealand's preference was for a set of rules that did not overregulate the use of electronic signatures.
While the general purpose of the Model Law is to facilitate the use of electronic signatures, it should not be construed in any way as imposing their use. .
The legal consequences of the use of a signature shall apply equally to the use of electronic signatures.
Paragraph(1) makes it clear that any entity that might validate the use of electronic signatures or otherwise certify their quality would not have to be established as a State authority.
The use of electronic signatures for producing legal effect equivalent to handwritten signatures raises several issues which are addressed by the UNCITRAL 2001 Model Law on Electronic Signatures. .
In that context, a provision along the lines of Variant A might discourage the use of electronic signatures by setting too strict a standard.
On the other hand,changing practices in the use of electronic signatures required a flexible criterion, such as embodied in article 7(1)(b) of the Model Law, more than an all-purpose test of reliability along the lines of draft article 61.
Conflicting technology-specific national legislation may therefore inhibit rather than promote the use of electronic signatures in international commerce.
As noted above,one of the main obstacles to the cross-border use of electronic signatures and authentication has been a lack of interoperability, due to conflicting or divergent standards or their inconsistent implementation.
Article 7 describes the role played by the enacting State in establishing orrecognizing any entity that might validate the use of electronic signatures or otherwise certify their quality.
The Model Law on Electronic Signatures(MLES) aims to enable and facilitate the use of electronic signatures by establishing criteria of technical reliability for the equivalence between electronic and hand-written signatures. .
ICC member companies from around the world have indicated substantial concern that Model Law Article 5 could,if unchanged, have a substantial negative effect on the use of electronic signatures and electronic commerce.
The definition simply illustrates the focus of the Model Law on the use of electronic signatures as functional equivalents of hand-written signatures see A/CN.9/483, para. 62.
On the other hand, fears about fraud and manipulation in electronic communications have led some jurisdictions to establish rather stringent regulatory requirements,which in turn may have discouraged the use of electronic signatures, in particular digital signatures. .
The definition simply illustrates the focus of the Model Law on the use of electronic signatures as functional equivalents of handwritten signatures see A/CN.9/483, para. 62.
In a globalized world, the use of electronic signatures would be an advantage in international trade, and his delegation was encouraged by the determination of the Working Group on Electronic Commerce to formulate rules on the matter despite the inherent difficulties.
At the same time, steps were being taken to develop a regulatory framework for electronic document management and the use of electronic signatures on the basis of internationally accepted legal norms.
It should be noted that some countries consider that the legal issues related to the use of electronic signatures have already been solved by the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce and do not plan to adopt further rules on electronic signatures until market practices in that new area.