Примеры использования Use of weapons of mass destruction на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Use of weapons of mass destruction.
Production, proliferation or use of weapons of mass destruction.
Use of weapons of mass destruction.
Yes, there will be wars,according to Vanga, the use of weapons of mass destruction.
The use of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, must be considered a war crime.
And finally, we will not tolerate the development or use of weapons of mass destruction.
The proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction is a source of grave concern for my delegation.
We also recognize that the use of weapons of mass destruction would be subject to the relevant provisions of international humanitarian law.
The endpoint of such a process may be the hitherto unimaginable use of weapons of mass destruction.
The risk of proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction must be taken very seriously.
Iran has also ratified other treaties that prohibit the development and use of weapons of mass destruction.
The use of weapons of mass destruction and the proliferation of cross-border crime constitute major risks for the entire international trade community.
They may indeed increase the dangers of the use of force, including the use of weapons of mass destruction.
However, while violations of a ban on the use of weapons of mass destruction would, in all likelihood, be visible, a violation of a ban on stockpiling could be hidden.
Ecuador is a peaceful land that espouses universal disarmament andcondemns the development and use of weapons of mass destruction.
State sponsorship of the possible development,acquisition and use of weapons of mass destruction by terrorists needs to be monitored carefully.
Loyal to those principles, my country promotes peace and universal disarmament andcondemns the development and use of weapons of mass destruction.
Unlike some others,we consider the development and use of weapons of mass destruction illegal, inhuman and against our basic principles.
The Organization of American States(OAS)maintains its position against the proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction.
The use of weapons of mass destruction with indiscriminate effects on combatants and non-combatants, should also constitute a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.
Only a multilateral and non-discriminatory approach could be effective in preventing the use of weapons of mass destruction by terrorists or States.
It was to be hoped that the use of weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines and blinding weapons would be added to the list of war crimes at the Review Conference.
Lastly, the Ministry of Defence supports non-proliferation efforts and condemns the use of weapons of mass destruction in the Mediterranean or anywhere in the world.
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty(CTBT) is a vital link in the network of treaties which aim at arresting and reducing the development,manufacture and potential use of weapons of mass destruction.
It is also concerned about the devastating effects of the manufacture and use of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery, whether by States or by non-State actors.
Therefore, it urges other States to adopt security anddefence policies that do not include the development or use of weapons of mass destruction.
In addition to the dangers of State use of weapons of mass destruction, we must also now confront the risk of use by terrorists or other non-State actors.
A short time ago the world held its breath as the spectre of war in SouthAsia cast its shadow, for fear of the use of weapons of mass destruction in that confrontation.
Today, our foremost fear is the acquisition and possible use of weapons of mass destruction by rogue States, by terrorists or-- perhaps most worrisome of all-- by terrorists armed by rogue States.