Приклади вживання Geocentrism Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Ptolemaic Geocentrism.
Geocentrism does not really have a“model” in a mathematical sense.
Show me how that is applied in geocentrism.
This is called“geocentrism” or the“geocentric view of the universe”.
In fact, several solar-centric views predated Ptolemy's geocentrism.
Absolute geocentrism requires a universe that does not work according to Newton's laws.
When all is said, it is clear that absolute geocentrism has extreme problems.
Geocentrism must address the experimental verification of both Newton and Einstein.
We should not make the opposite errorby ignoring modern science and adopting absolute geocentrism.
Absolute geocentrism could never have predicted Uranus and Neptune from orbital mechanics.
But of course this hasalready been explained in Refuting absolute geocentrism: Biblical phenomenological language.
Geocentrism must claim the two phenomena are due to different causes, which is nonsensical.
It is common for sceptics to attack the Bible for teaching a primitive cosmology,including a flat earth and geocentrism.
This established absolute geocentrism as the ruling scientific paradigm for almost 1,500 years.
For additional discussion of thisclass of verses, see our other paper, Refuting absolute geocentrism: Biblical phenomenological language.
If geocentrism is true, nutations and earthquakes change the rotational speed of the universe instead.
These are examples where they take verses once used for geocentrism and pretend that they imply a flat earth.
While modern geocentrism has been around for nearly a half-century, it now has far fewer adherents than flat earth does.
There were good reasons for most early people to believe in geocentrism and the scholars listed multiple evidences in support of it.
Geocentrism(in the classical sense of taking the Earth as an absolute reference frame) is taught by Scripture and Heliocentrism is anti-Scriptural.”.
Actually, we note with some irony the modern‘moon landinghoax' nonsense tends to accompany flat-earthism(and geocentrism, but that is another story).
We reject this dogmatic geocentrism, and believes that the Biblical passages about sunset etc.
Others have argued that the“Church” suppressedscientific advance by persecuting those who argued against absolute geocentrism, but history paints a very different picture.
Last year, we took the subject of geocentrism head on(and earlier this year we further refuted geocentric supporters).
Nutations' like this are explained by Newtonian theory to a high degree of accuracy,but would be nothing more than arbitrary changes in the rotation of the cosmos under geocentrism.
Flat-earthers seem to think that an argument for geocentrism automatically is an argument for a flat earth, but in many respects the two are unrelated.
Geocentrists often quote gleefully about supposed geocentric evidence in cosmology, but this is on a galactic scale-a scale far too large to differentiate heliocentrism from geocentrism.
Third, their geocentrism was Ptolemaic Geocentrism, while modern geocentrists actually hold the Tychonian(or Tychonic) hybrid geo-heliocentrist view(see below).
First, all the pagans of their day also supported geocentrism, so the Church Fathers just reflected common sense, common contemporary scientific ideas, or common use of language.
For those who think the Bible demands absolute geocentrism, it is notable that Newton wrote even more about theology than science, and thought his greatest work was an exposition of the prophecy of Daniel.