Приклади вживання Number of mandates Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Both parties will receive an equal number of mandates.
Determination of the total number of mandates, distributed in each electoral region.
For that, the number of the persons whovoted in an electoral district is divided by the number of mandates.
This sum of votes is divided by 225- the number of mandates to be distributed in the federal electoral district.
The number of mandates received by political parties, electoral blocs of parties shall be the result of elections.
The number of such candidates equals to the number of mandates received by the party in its region.
Usually, the number of mandates distributed over the regions depends on the number of registered voters.
Rating,% Among those who would come to the elections,% Imitation of the elections,% Approximate number of mandates(225 in total).
In the case of mnogomandatnogo constituency number of mandates to be distributed in the district may not exceed five.
All in all, those political parties are represented in raion(district) councils by 12,743 deputies,this making up 84.6% of the overall number of mandates.
Based on the current system, the authors propose to increase the number of mandates distributed in each district, at least twice.
Dependence on the number of mandates in the region on the turnout may provoke local elites to abuse administrative resources and to resort to fraud.
In our case,the change in the number of voters did not affect the number of mandates- 14(when the number voters is in the range of 1,000- 3,000).
Accordingly, a greater number of mandates would be distributed among closed national lists(the so-called“compensatory level” of the electoral system).
Candidates are also nominated by parties, and in each constituency they can nominate several candidates(from 1 to M,where M is the number of mandates distributed in the constituency).
In the case of mnogomandatnogo constituency number of mandates to be distributed in the district may not exceed five.
The“quota” is calculated as a quotient from dividing the sum of all the votes(overall in Ukraine)that were given for the parties overcoming the threshold, for the number of mandates distributed(in our case, it is 450).
The CEC summarises the number of mandates, received by MP candidates, who are included in regional electoral lists of all parties in each electoral region.
Parties are nominated in the constituencies by parties(moreover, there may be several party candidates in the constituency-no more than the number of mandates distributed in the constituency), and self-nomination is also allowed.
In each district(area of the city), the number of mandates received by the district party list is calculated as the integer part of dividing the sum of votes(received by this district list) by the electoral quota.
Indeed, in 1998, when the notion of“mixed system of elections” appeared,the Court pointed out that the results of the parliamentary elections are the total number of mandates that belong to the list of nominated candidates.
And if the required number of mandates is not reached, then the ruling coalition will in fact be forced to announce early parliamentary elections, which will necessarily affect the distribution of political forces in the country.
Moreover, we are talking about aplurality system with the possibility of nominating several(according to the number of mandates in the district) candidates from each party- which means that we can assume that the winners in the districts will win with very little percentages.
The current calculation formula, tied to the number of voters in the corresponding territory, looks simpler, fairer, and even with the“political will” to reduce the number of deputies in local councils- it's more logical, starting from this formula,simply proportionally reduce the number of mandates.
The whole part of the result of this division is the number of mandates allocated to the respective federal list of candidates as a result of initial distribution of deputy mandates. .
Total number of council's members, determined by part three of this article”- this rule can be interpreted in different ways,as part three of this article provides for the calculation of the number of mandates depending on the number of voters residing on the territory of the respective council.
The first thing that the authors propose in these modifications(1.2. and 2.2.)is to increase the number of mandates distributed in the districts by at least two times(to make it possible to guarantee the representation of each district by providing the mandate of the first-past-the-post candidate).
But other features of the law have been rather controversial- examples being the high overall cost of the program(the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the ACA will cost over a trillion dollars over the next decade), a new set of taxes(mostly on high earners and on the healthcare industry),and the large number of mandates imposed by the ACA on both individuals and corporations which are said to limit liberty and freedoms.
If on elections to legislative(representative) public authority or to representative body of the municipality constituencies with different number of mandates are formed, each voter has the poll equal to number of the mandates whichare subject to distribution in the constituency with the smallest number of mandates or one voice.
In general, the Concept leaves the broadest field for strategic manipulations with the formation of districts- majoritarian systems are muchmore vulnerable to such manipulations with determining the number of mandates in districts, the boundaries of districts(“gerrymandering”) and the unequal“weight” of votes in different districts(“malapportionment”).