Приклади вживання Take or pay Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The condition“take or pay” completely abolished;
Naftogaz” announced the loss of Gazprom's right to take or pay in 2018.
Naftogaz” will not pay in full for its violation of the“take or pay” conditions and got a retrospective reduction of the contract price.
If it did not consume such volume, it still should have paid for this(condition“take or pay”).
Calculating revenue under take or pay gas contracts.
Also, Russia abandoned demands that Hungaryshould pay for unused gas under a“take or pay” clause.
The gas price formula and the“take or pay” principle remained unchanged.
According to the decision of Stockholm,Ukraine is obliged to buy Russian gas according to the formula"take or pay".
Gazprom will not require the payment of fines by the rule‘take or pay' for the supply of gas in the second quarter of 2015," he said.
According to the decision of Stockholm,Ukraine is obliged to buy Russian gas according to the formula"take or pay".
But the most that bothered the Ukrainian side, is the condition take or pay“take or pay”, as well as the issue of re-export of Russian gas.
Thanks to this arbitration case we established that wedo not owe Gazprom according to the so-called‘take or pay' principle.
The arbitral tribunal completely rejected the demands of Gazprom for the" take or pay"provisions of$ 56 billion for 2009-2017,"- said in Naftogaz.
Earlier, Gazprom issued an$ 5.3 bln bill toUkraine for a shortage of gas contracted under the"Take or Pay" rule.
The court overturned the onerous condition“take or pay”, according to which Ukraine had to pay 52 billion cubic meters of gas annually, regardless of the actual supply.
And this despite the fact that Tymoshenko agreed with Putin about the onerous position of“take or pay” contract for gas supply.
Provision for payment of the amount of gas that Ukraine is not even received, it was recognized arbitration bonded,and does not meet the standard of European the provision of“take or pay”.
In May 2017, the tribunal issued a preliminary decision andreportedly rejected Gazprom's claim that Naftogaz had violated“take or pay” provisions in their sales-purchase agreement.
Second, by the end of March as a deviation from the existing gas contractwill not apply the principle of” take or pay.
In addition, the arbitrators released Naftogaz from the obligation to buy 52 billion cubic meters per year from Gazprom according to the“take or pay” rule, reducing the obligatory amount to 5 billion cubic meters.
But on the other hand, for example, thanks to this arbitration case we established that wedo not owe Gazprom according to the so-called‘take or pay' principle.
Unstated, but likely benefits for the current government and its big business include a“gentleman's” agreement, whereby the RF will continue negotiations on the price and volume of Ukraine's import of natural gas andwill refrain from the prescribed“take or pay” requirement(in other words, Gazprom can allow Ukraine not to purchase the entire volume of gas indicated in the contract).
The bulk of the claims of«Gazprom» to«Naftogaz» in the framework of the dispute on the supplies went to penalties for arrears of gas at the contractual rule of«take or pay»(take or pay).
The court obliged«Naftogaz» to pay«Gazprom»$ 2 billion for gas already delivered, and also reduced annual contract amount of purchases up to 5 billion cubic meters ofgas, but left the condition«take or pay» for 80% of this amount, that is 4 billion cubic meters.
Autumn negotiations on European association again raised the specter of dispute between Gazprom and Naftogaz on the validity of the Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Contract in 2009-2019 andthe application of its“take or pay” provision.
The Ukrainian government would probably refer to the lifting of Naftogaz's import monopoly in 2011, argue that the total imports of Russian gas should include the quantity from Ostchem Holding,and try to undermine the‘take or pay' clause and the overly high price of gas charged by Gazprom.
The refusal of Gazprom to supply gas to Naftogaz of Ukraine in accordance with the prepaidpayment deprives the Russian company of the right to take or pay measure in 2018.
The court obliged"Naftogaz" to pay"Gazprom"$ 2 billion for gas already delivered, and also reduced annual contract amount of purchases up to 5 billion cubic meters of gas,but left the condition"Take or pay" for 80% of this volume, that is.