Примери за използване на Acquisition of territory на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Acquisition of territory by military conquest.
Reaffirming again that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible.
No acquisition of territory by force shall ever be recognized by the international community as lawful.
Reaffirming again that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible.
To begin with, many invasions in history have not been motivated by the permanent acquisition of territory.
Reaffirming that acquisition of territory by force is inadmissable.
According to the preambular paragraph of UN Security Council Resolution 242,“the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.”.
Reaffirming that acquisition of territory by force is inadmissable.
The EU policy on Jerusalem is based on the principles set out in UN Security Council Resolution 242,notably the impossibility of acquisition of territory by force.
Reaffirming that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible.
The US backed Resolution 242 adopted in 1967,which calls on Israel to withdraw from territories it occupied during the war and refers to the"inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war".
It reaffirms that the acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible.
The status of East Jerusalem remains subject to the principles set out in Security Council resolution 242(1967),notably that of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force.
Reaffirming that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible.
East Jerusalem is subject to the principles set out by the UN Security Council Resolution 242,notably the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force and is therefore not under Israeli sovereignty.
Both the acquisition of territory and military successes benefited the economy and standing of the United States.
Reaffirming the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible.
It reaffirmed its position that East Jerusalem was subject to the principles set out in Security Council resolution 242(1967),which affirmed in particular the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force.
This reaffirmed the well-established principle that the acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible.
UN 242"emphasiz[es] the inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every state in the area can live in security.".
(4) Adopted in November 1967, after the Six Day war,the resolution denounced the acquisition of territory by war and referred to the Palestinians solely as“refugees”.
Resolution 242 emphasized“the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security.”.
In response to the Six-Day War, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 242 emphasizing the"inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security.".
In a similar vein,for centuries the definition of Russian national greatness was equated with the acquisition of territory, and even at the end of the twentieth century, the Russian insistence on retaining control over such non-Russian people as the Chechens, who live around a vital oil pipeline, has been justified by the claim that such control is essential to Russia's status as a great power.".
It recognizes the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force and calls for Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories.