Примери за използване на Air carrier concerned на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Furthermore, the‘wildcat strike' at issue in the main proceedings cannot be regarded as beyond the actual control of the air carrier concerned.
According to the Court it is an event which“is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.”.
Therefore, if the malfunctioning of a tyre is the sole result of impact with a foreign object lying on the airport runway, it cannot be regarded as inherent,by its nature or origin, in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned.
In the present case, it is apparent from the file submitted to the Court that the‘wildcat strike' among the staff of the air carrier concerned has its origins in the carrier's surprise announcement of a corporate restructuring process.
Therefore, under the conditions referred to in paragraphs 38 and 39 of this judgment,the risks arising from the social consequences that go with such measures must be regarded as inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned.
In this case they said that an extraordinary circumstances was something“Not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.”.
A disabled person orperson with reduced mobility who considers that this Regulation has been infringed may bring the matter to the attention of the managing body of the airport or to the attention of the air carrier concerned, as the case may.
Such circumstances cannot therefore be regarded as not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned or outside that carrier's actual control.
It is important that a disabled person orperson with reduced mobility who considers that this Regulation has been infringed be able to bring the matter to the attention of the managing body of the airport or to the attention of the air carrier concerned, as the case may be.
The Court stated that“extraordinary circumstances” may be regarded as covering only circumstances which are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.
The CJEU held today that a collision between an aircraft and a bird, as well as any damage caused by that collision, are not intrinsically linked to the operating system of the aircraft, with the result that such a collision is notby its nature or origin inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is outside its actual control.
Finally, in case of technical problems extraordinary circumstances must relate to an event which meets two cumulative conditions: first,it is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned; second, it is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin(48).
Extraordinary circumstances” as a trigger for compensation is clarified to mean“circumstances which are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.”.
Its proposal defines“extraordinary circumstances” as those which are“not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control”.
Extraordinary circumstances” means circumstances which, by their nature or origin,are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.
The Commission's proposal defines«extraordinary circumstances»as circumstances which are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.
The Commission's proposal defines"extraordinary circumstances" as circumstances which are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.
The European Court of Justice has held that technical faults will only fall into this category where the problem stems from events which, by their nature or origin,are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.
However, the circumstances surrounding the occurrence of those problems may be classified as‘extraordinary' only if they relate to an event which is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.
With reference to recital 14 in that regulation, it pointed out that a problem may be classified as extraordinary only if it relates to an event which is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.
(should be) deemed to exist where the impact of an air traffic management decision in relation to a particular aircraft on a particular day gives rise to a long delay, or the cancellation of one or more flights by that aircraft, even ifall reasonable measures had been taken by the air carrier concerned to avoid the delays or cancellations'.
In that connection, the Court ruled in Wallentin‑Hermann that extraordinary circumstances for the purposes of Regulation No 261/2004 relate to an event which- in common with the events listed in recital 14 to that regulation- is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and is beyond the actual control of that carrier on account of its nature or origin.
Which granted the operating licence to the Union air carriers concerned pursuant to Regulation(EC) No 1008/2008; or.
Member States will not be able to access the databases of air carriers, the data must be requested and sent to them by the air carriers concerned(‘push method').
The existence of injury orthreat of injury to the Union air carriers concerned;
The redressive measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exceed what is necessary to offset the injury to the Union air carriers concerned.
Under whose air transport agreement, air services agreement or any other agreement containing provisions on air transport services with the third country concerned, the Union air carriers concerned operate;
The Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or, when this was not practicable, through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose them an operating ban within the Community.
Without prejudice to Article 13, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 5 determines that a practice distorting competition, adopted by a third country or a third-country entity,has caused injury to the Union air carriers concerned.
Without prejudice to Article 13, the Commission may, adopt implementing acts, laying down redressive measures if the investigation conducted under Article 5 determines that a practice distorting competition, adopted by a third country or a third-country entity,causes a threat of injury, in accordance with Article 12(2) and(3), to the Union air carriers concerned.