Примери за използване на Bis in idem principle на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
- 
                        Official
                    
 - 
                        Colloquial
                    
 - 
                        Medicine
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Computer
                    
 
The State argued that it would violate the non bis in idem principle.
The ne bis in idem principle is well established in  Union law.
In short, there had been a breach of the non bis in idem principle.
The ne bis in idem principle was not an explicit part of the ECHR at the outset.
The ne bis in idem principle is well established in  the law of most European countries.
Prohibition against prosecution andpunishment for the same cause of action(ne bis in idem principle).
The ne bis in idem principle is present in  various articles in  European Union Law.
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of the ne bis in idem principle in  European Union law.
The ne bis in idem principle is set out in  Article 50 of the Charter, which reads as follows.
The extent of the transfer of responsibility for guaranteeing the ne bis in idem principle from the Member States to the Union.
The ne bis in idem principle- where the same person cannot be tried twice for the same crime- is a fundamental principle  of law within a democracy.
We should be pleased that the ne bis in idem principle is ensured in  the area of states' courts.
The three questions refer to different elements of the same fundamental right, which I shall examine below, butalways as an integral part of the ne bis in idem principle.
Such a system should also respect the ne bis in idem principle whereby sanctions cannot be imposed twice for the same offence.
It must be borne in  mind that nowadays the ne bis in idem principle is enshrined in  the Charter,in  Article 50 thereof to be exact.
(44) The context of this case concerns the implementation of Union law in  a Member State,which is precisely the sphere in  which the broadest conception of the ne bis in idem principle applies.
The third and fourth questions concern the procedural aspect of the ne bis in idem principle, which involves the prohibition of double prosecution.
In the alternative, should the Court hold that it has jurisdiction to give a ruling on the substance, I shall suggest an autonomous definition of the ne bis in idem principle in  Union law.
As the case-law currently stands, the Court of Justice affords the ne bis in idem principle fairly uniform treatment, with a number of exceptions which I shall describe below.(42).
(c) it is instantly clear from the information provided in  the certificate that rendering judicial assistance pursuant to Article 10 for the offence in  respect of which the freezingorder has been made, would infringe the ne bis in idem principle;
The above provisions shall not preclude the application of broader national provisions on the ne bis in idem principle with regard to judicial decisions taken abroad.
The unsuccessful application of the ne bis in idem principle, which features in  the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, violates fundamental rights and runs counter to the EU's objective to create a common space of freedom, security and justice.
The other, substantive, issue concerns the way in  which the ne bis in idem principle operates in  a situation where the power to impose administrative penalties and the penalising authority of a Member State are accumulated to punish the same conduct, and that issue takes us to Article 50 of the Charter.
Conversely, if you have been judged in  those proceedingsin  another Member State, you may not, by virtue of the non bis in idem principle(you cannot be judged twice for the same offence), be prosecuted or judged in  France.
If Question 2 is answered in  the affirmative,are the conditions under the ne bis in idem principle for the imposition of several sanctions in  separate proceedings satisfied where in  the later proceedings there is an examination of the circumstances of the case which is fresh and independent of the earlier proceedings?
The Court considers finally that the conditions to which EU law subjects a possible duplication of proceedings andpenalties of a criminal nature guarantee a level of protection of the ne bis in idem principle which does not infringe that guaranteed by the ECHR.
The Court of Justice of the European Union considers that the ne bis in idem principle may be limited for the purpose of protecting the financial interests of the EU and the financial markets thereof.