Примери за използване на Both treatment arms на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Virologic response rate was evaluated in both treatment arms.
Response rates were>94% for both treatment arms across these common pathogens.
Both treatment arms were titrated to achieve target fasting plasma glucose levels(see section 5.1).
Body weight loss was observed in both treatment arms(-4.3 kg with liraglutide and -3.7 kg with lixisenatide).
For both studies at 48 weeks, the virologic response rate was evaluated in both treatment arms.
Most patients in both treatment arms had visceral disease(215[73%] patients overall).
There was no statistical difference between both treatment arms in pain progression and pain response.
In both treatment arms, patients who experienced neutropenia had a longer median OS compared to patients who did not experience neutropenia.
Seventy-seven percent(77%) of subjects in both treatment arms had prior surgery or radiotherapy of the prostate.
In both treatment arms, children aged 6-11 years had a numerically higher rate of confirmed hypoglycaemia than in the other age groups.
In the clinical trial(LUME-Lung 1; see section 5.1) with Vargatef,the frequency of bleeding in both treatment arms was comparable(see section 4.8).
The ORR was similar for both treatment arms(13.4% versus 12.5%, ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI versus placebo plus FOLFIRI, respectively).
Patients' physical function,global health status and diarrhoea scores showed a clinically meaningful change during chemotherapy in both treatment arms.
Histological subtype was similar in both treatment arms, with 33% hyaline vascular subtype, 23% plasmacytic subtype and 44% mixed subtype.
BRCA mutation status(breast cancer susceptibility gene 1[BRCA1] positive or breast cancer susceptibility gene 2[BRCA2] positive)was similar across both treatment arms.
The similar incidences of these events in both treatment arms, indicated that these adverse drug reactions are not attributable to VELCADE alone.
However, the proportion of patients who had post-treatment elevations associated with bilirubin elevations was low and similar in both treatment arms(see Table 3 in section 5.1).
The rate of adverse events in both treatment arms was similar to the rate seen in patients treated with canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
In six studies, Xultophy produced clinically and statistically significant improvements in glycaemic control versus comparators as measured by glycated haemaglobin A1c(HbA1c),whereas one study demonstrated a similar reduction of HbA1c in both treatment arms.
Virologic response rate was evaluated in both treatment arms and virologic response was defined as achieving an undetectable viral load(< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml).
The incidence of infection was 38% in the Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil arm and 37% in the rituximab plus chlorambucil arm(with Grade 3-5 events reported in 12% and 14%, respectively and fatal events reported in<1% in both treatment arms).
Patients were treated with a loading dose of Cimzia 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4(for both treatment arms) or placebo followed by either 200 mg of Cimzia every 2 weeks or 400 mg of Cimzia every 4 weeks or placebo.
Healthcare professionals should be informed of the increased incidence of fractures and deaths among patients receiving Xofigo in combination with abiraterone acetate and prednisone/prednisolone compared to patients receiving placebo in combination with abiraterone acetate and prednisone/prednisolone in Study ERA-223, andof the reduced incidence of fractures observed in both treatment arms with concurrent use of bisphosphonates or denosumab bone health agents.
Patients received a loading dose of Cimzia 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4(for both treatment arms) or placebo followed by either Cimzia 200 mg every 2 weeks or 400 mg every 4 weeks or placebo every 2 weeks.
Tolerability was comparable in both treatment arms, however cough was more often reported with the ramipril regimen than the aliskiren regimen(14.2% vs. 4.4%), whilst diarrhoea was more common with the aliskiren regimen than for the ramipril regimen(6.6% vs. 5.0%).
The median duration of follow-up of subjects(defined as date of randomisation to date of last contact or death)was similar for both treatment arms 9.36 months for placebo[range 0.69 to 23.0 months] and 10.04 months for pazopanib[range 0.2 to 24.3 months].
In the as treated(AT)analysis the difference between both treatment arms was more noticeable 88% of patients in the abacavir group, compared to 95% of patients in the zidovudine group(point estimate for treatment difference: -6.8, 95% CI11.8; -1.7).
In a 12-week trial of children aged 4 to 11 years[n=257] treated with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 orsalmeterol 50 micrograms+ fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms both twice daily, both treatment arms experienced a 14% increase in peak expiratory flow rate as well as improvements in symptom score and rescue salbutamol use.
Based on the FACT-Lym questionnaire collected during treatment and follow-up phases,patients in both treatment arms experienced clinically meaningful improvements in lymphoma-related symptoms as defined by a³ 3 point increase from baseline in the Lymphoma subscale, a³ 6 point increase from baseline in the FACT Lym TOI and a³ 7 point increase from baseline in the FACT Lym Total score.