Примери за използване на Commission should review на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Commission should review the provision by….
Recommendation 2 As preparation for developing its proposal for the next CAP reform, the Commission should review and take stock of the implementation of the current CAP.
The Commission should review this, but has yet to introduce a proposal.
(20) For the proper functioning of this Regulation, the Commission should review its application and propose such amendments as may appear necessary.
The Commission should review that limit value by using the most up-to-date scientific and socio-economic data.
No later than 1 June 2011 andevery five years thereafter, the Commission should review the application of this Regulation and propose such amendments as may appear necessary.
The Commission should review the list on at least a biannual basis, or upon the justified request of a jurisdiction on the list.
(2) Article 18 of Regulation(EEC) No 880/92 provides that within five years from its entry into force the Commission should review the scheme in the light of the experience gained during its operation and should propose any appropriate amendments to the Regulation.
The Commission should review the guidelines regularly to ensure that they remain appropriate in a rapidly developing market.
In particular, Member States' audit authorities need to improve their sampling and documentation, their audit work, and their audit of advances for financial instruments andstate aid projects, and the Commission should review how it estimates the residual error rate.
The European Commission should review this and the French government should react.”.
In order toensure that it is updated in accordance with the latest technological developments while avoiding unintended negative effects, the Commission should review that annex in order to assess whether new feedstock should be added.
To that end, the Commission should review whether more harmonised distribution of responsibilities between services would improve process efficiency.
According to its internal rules, the Commission should review the annual reports within three months of receipt.
The Commission should review its practice on communicating and disseminating its evaluation findings to ensure that stakeholders receive the necessary information.
In addition, we recommended that the Commission should review the legal requirements for Member States to improve the timeliness of statistical data.
(81) The Commission should review the effectiveness of this Regulation in light of its objectives and the contribution to the implementation of the regulatory framework and the smooth functioning of the internal market.
No later than three years after entering into force and every six years thereafter, the Commission should review the functioning and the effectiveness of this Regulation, including as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals within its scope from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
Furthermore, the Commission should review the reporting system of the scheme in order to ensure that accurate and timely information on the target group and on implementation is available.
No later than three years after entering into force and every six years thereafter, the Commission should review the functioning and the effectiveness of this Regulation, including as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals within its scope from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
Therefore, the Commission should review, three years after the date from which this Regulation applies, the provisions on the objectives of and conditions for issuing alerts for the purpose of refusing entry or stay.
Recommendation 2- Review requirements for national budgetary frameworks To further strengthen budgetary frameworks, the Commission should review the requirements for medium-term budgetary frameworks and independent fiscal institutions, also taking into account international standards and best practice, and propose actions as appropriate to improve their scope and effectiveness.
The Commission should review the provision on high quality infrastructure projects in order to assess: its impact on the volume of infrastructure investments by institutions and the quality of investments having regard to Union's objectives to move towards a low-carbon, climate-resilient and circular economy;
In order to ensure financial stability, the Commission should review and report on measures to enhance the transparency of OTC markets, to mitigate the counterparty risks and more generally to reduce the overall risks, such as by clearing of credit default swaps through central counterparties(CCPs).
(11) The Commission should review the application of this Directive after a period of five years, including a determination of whether the Directive should continue to be applied or amended.
Not later than four years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should review the operation of the system of access to all vehicle repair and maintenance information with a view to determining whether it would be appropriate to consolidate all provisions governing access to vehicle repair and maintenance information within a revised framework Directive on type approval.
On that basis, the Commission should review the progress made across the Union to assess whether further action is needed to achieve the objectives proposed in this Recommendation.
Not later than four years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should review the operation of the system of access to all vehicle repair and maintenance information with a view to determining whether it would be appropriate to consolidate all provisions governing access to vehicle repair and maintenance information within a revised framework Directive on type approval.
Therefore, the Commission should review, three years after the entry into application of this Regulation, the provisions on the objectives and the conditions for issuing alerts for the purpose of refusal of entry or stay.
(36) The Commission should review and report on the application of Article 113(4) of Directive 2006/48/EC including whether exemptions should be a matter of national discretion.