Примери за използване на Committing member state на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Preliminary analysis of the initiative document by the committing Member State.
The competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State shall examine the reply transmitted by the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the transferring Member State and take, within a maximum of one month after its receipt one or more of the following actions, to be transmitted to the competent transferring authority in writing.
The competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State shall analyse the initiative document.
Within three months of receipt of an initiative document, the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the transferring Member State shall send its preliminary reaction to the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State.
(a) a description of the joint project and of its context,of the corresponding legal obstacle in the committing Member State as well as of the rationale for resolving the legal obstacle;
Upon receipt of an initiative document, the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the transferring Member State shall also carry out the tasks listed in Article 10(2) andmay send its preliminary reaction to the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State.
(a) a description of the joint project and of its context, of thone ormore corresponding legal obstacles in the committing Member State as well as of the rationale for resolving thone or more legal obstacles;
(e) inform the initiator about its assessment that the legal obstacle consists in one of the situations under Article 12(4) while setting out its reasons to refuse to change or adapt that legal obstacle andreferring to the means of legal redress against that decision under the law of the committing Member State;
(a) a description of the joint project and of its context, of thone ormore corresponding legal obstacles in the committing Member State as well as of the rationale for resolving thone or more legal obstacles;
Where the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State considers that the revised initiative document is still not prepared in accordance with Article 10 or that the additional specific information is still not sufficient, it shall, within six months after receipt of the revised initiative document, inform the initiator in writing about its decision to end the procedure.
Within six months after receipt of the initiative document the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State shall take, one or more of the following actions, to be transmitted to the initiator in writing.
Point or competent transferring authority in the cases of points(a) or(b) of paragraph 1 or, where the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the transferring Member State has reacted positively under the second procedure of point(d)of paragraph 1, the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State shall.
It shall liaise with all competent committing authorities and with the national or, where relevant, other regional orlocal Cross-border Coordination Points in the committing Member State and with the national Cross- border Coordination Point in the transferring Member State. .
Where the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State requests a revised initiative document or additional specific information, it shall analyse the revised initiative document or the additional specific information or both and take, within six months after receipt thereof, the actions as if the initiative document was submitted for the first time.
In Member States where the competent transferring authority shall sign a Commitment or Statement, the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the transferring Member State shall send, in accordance with points(a) and(b) of paragraph 1,one of the two original copies signed by the competent transferring authority to the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State.
Where the analysis by the competent Cross-border Coordination Point of the committing Member State or the competent committing authority concludes that the legal obstacle described in the initiative document is based on a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the relevant legislation or on the lack of sufficient information about the relevant legislation, the procedure ends by informing the initiator about the assessment that there is no legal obstacle.
The preamble to the Lisbon Treaty commits Member States to establishing economic and monetary union: a single, stable currency.
Where infringements are committed, member states impose penalties such as suspension or withdrawal of the authorisation or driver attestation.
Boost European defense capabilities, by establishing a European army of committed Member States, while working towards the creation of EU-wide permanent forces with a unified EU military command under civilian control.
Senior politicians in some member states(notably France) have suggested that if only a few countries fail to ratify the Treaty, then the rest of the Union should proceed without them, possibly creating an"Avant Garde" orInner Union of more committed member states to proceed with"an ever-deeper, ever-wider union".
Commissioner, you say that the Member State is committing itself to this.
Preliminary analysis of the initiative document by the committing and transferring Member State or States.
(c) upon request from a given competent committing authority located in another Member State, perform the preliminary analysis of an initiative document;
(c)upon request from a given competent committing authority located in another Member State without its own Cross-border Coordination point, perform the preliminary analysis of an initiative document;
Previously serious errors were treated as quantifiable errors when the error was committed by Member State authorities or international organisations.
We must be able to hold those committing infringements to account at both Member State and European Union level.