Примери за използване на Common result indicators на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(38) The CF andERDF have no common result indicators.
Common result indicators exist only for the ESF, but not for the ERDF.
There are programme-specific result indicators and also,for the ESF, common result indicators.
The reported values on common result indicators shall be expressed in absolute numbers.
For the 2021-2027 period, the Commission has proposed for the first time a set of common result indicators for each fund66.
There are common result indicators only for the ESF, but not for the ERDF(see Table 5).
We recommend that the Commission proposes to the legislator that the performance framework is based,as far as possible, on common result indicators.
Targets for common result indicators shall be fixed in absolute numbers or as a percentage.
But some limitations remain 90 To overcome the weaknesses identified for the 2007-2013 programme period,the 2014-2020 legal framework introduced common result indicators.
Common result indicators are also set in the EAFRD regulation and aggregated at the level of the Union.
During the 2007- 2013 programming period, there were no common result indicators by target group in the EU regu- latory requirements.
(3) For ESF, the common result indicators include the indicators set out in Annex I and II of the Regulation(EU) No 1304/2013.
For the 2021-2027 programme period, the Commission proposes to increase the number of common indicators related to cultural sites and,for the first time, to include common result indicators(see Annex VIII).
For the ESF, there are 23 common result indicators and an additional 1 976 programme-specific result indicators. .
For the 2014-2020 period, the legislative framework introduced a set of common output indicators for all three funds forming the Cohesion policy(ERDF, CF and ESF)as well as common result indicators for ESF.
On average, each ESF OP used 3.1 common result indicators and 14.4 different programme-specific result indicators. .
VIII The Commission underlines the significant improvements in the monitoring andevaluation system of the 2014-2020 programme period, particularly related to the obligation of reporting on common result indicators and to carry out impact evaluations at the level of priority axes.
ERDF does not include common result indicators, as the result is“what is intended to be changed, with the contribution of the interventions designed”.
Furthermore, four years into the programming period, Poland andRomania had not provided complete information regarding the two common result indicators and the methodologies used by Spain(Castilla y León), France and Italy(Lazio) were not reliable.
The Commission should define common result indicators for the ERDF, improve reporting on performance, and ensure a meaningful performance review in 2019.
For the ERDF, this is also due to the fact that there are no common result indicators; those used at Member State level cannot, therefore, be aggregated.
The common result indicators are not always relevant to the Member States' RDP objectives, so they do not have the effect of quantifying what the programmes intend to achieve.
The Commission's legislative proposal for the post-2020 programming period includes a list of common result indicators for ERDF and the Cohesion Fund in line with the Better Regulation Guidelines and harmonised with ESF.
The common result indicators introduced by the ESF regulation include both immediate and longer-term result indicators that measure the effect on employment of the measures implemented.
We recommend that all partnership agreements andprogrammes include common result indicators, where possible shared by the different funds, and designed to monitor progress at the local, Member State and EU level.
The common result indicators introduced by the 2014-2020 ESF regulation include both immediate and longer-term result indicators that capture the impact on employment of the measures implemented.
The Commission's legislative proposal for the post-2020 programming period includes a list of common result indicators for ERDF and the Cohesion Fund in line with the Better Regulation Guidelines and with the concept of‘results' used under the ESF.
The common result indicators, in particular, left too much room for interpretation, data was costly or difficult to collect and some indicators were of limited value, as they did not show the results of the measures, as illustrated in Box 1.
The Commission has also proposed that appropriate targets are set for each of the focus areas of the Union priorities, on the basis of common result indicators, and that the selected measures in relation to the Union priorities are based on sound intervention logic supported by an ex ante evaluation.
Despite the inadequacy of the common result indicators, which was explicitly acknowledged in the RDPs of Portugal(Mainland) and the UK(England), the audited Member States have not defined additional indicators to capture this important information as regards NPI support.