Примери за използване на Comparator vaccine на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This was compared with 94% of the people receiving the comparator vaccine(347 out of 370).
The comparator vaccine contained different strains of seasonal flu virus, but the rest of the components were the same as in Aflunov.
Systemic safety profile of INTANZA is similar to the comparator vaccine administered intramuscularly.
In the first study, the immunogenicity of Pumarix was shown to be comparable to that of the comparator vaccine.
Cervarix was more effective than the comparator vaccine in preventing abnormal cell growth in the cervix.
In the pivotal study(V59P13), adolescents oradults received either a dose of Menveo(N= 2649) comparator vaccine ACWY-D(N= 875).
Cervarix was more effective than the comparator vaccine in preventing abnormal cell growth in the cervix.
The Control Group in dengue studies was defined as subjects who received at least one injection of placebo or comparator vaccine.
In all studies, both IDflu and the comparator vaccine brought about adequate levels of antibodies for protection against all three flu strains.
Apparent local reactions after intradermal administration were more frequent than after the comparator vaccine administered intramuscularly.
In the five original studies, both IDflu and the comparator vaccine brought about adequate levels of antibodies for protection against all three flu strains.
On average, the levels of antibodies were over 2 times higher in the people receiving Ixiaro than in those receiving the comparator vaccine.
The children in this study were given either Synflorix or a comparator vaccine which was not active against S. pneumoniae and were followed up for an average of 30 months.
Apparent local reactions after intradermal administration were more frequent than after intramuscular administration of an adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted comparator vaccine.
Ixiaro(given as 2 doses 4 weeks apart)was as effective as the comparator vaccine at triggering the production of antibodies against the Japanese encephalitis virus.
In the pivotal study V59P20 immunogenicity of Menveo was compared to ACWY-D; 1170 children were vaccinated with Menveo and1161 received the comparator vaccine in the per protocol populations.
The main measure of effectiveness was whether Menveo was as good as the comparator vaccine at stimulating immune response against the four types of N. meningitidis oligosaccharides.
Apparent local reactions after intradermal administration were more frequent than after intramuscular administration of an adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted comparator vaccine.
The results of the main studies showed that Menveo was as effective as the comparator vaccine in stimulating an immune response against all four types of N. meningitidis oligosaccharides in adults and children from the age of two.
Synflorix was evaluated in a large study involving over 30,000 infants below 7 months of age who were given either Synflorix or a comparator vaccine which was not active against S. pneumoniae.
In the original main study, both Optaflu and the comparator vaccine brought about adequate levels of antibodies for protection against all three flu strains, as defined in criteria laid down by the CHMP for flu vaccines. .
The studies in infants andolder children showed that although Synflorix produced a lower antibody response than the comparator vaccine, it fulfilled pre-defined criteria and was considered acceptable in this group.
Synflorix was effective in protecting against invasive disease: no cases were seen among the 10,000 children given three doses of Synflorix and a booster dose, one case occurred among the 10,000 children given two doses of Synflorix and a booster dose and12 cases occurred in 10,000 children given the comparator vaccine.
In studies in infants and older children,although Synflorix produced a lower antibody response than the comparator vaccine, it fulfilled pre-defined criteria and was considered acceptable in this group.
In the original main study, both Optaflu and the comparator vaccine brought about adequate levels of antibodies for protection against all three flu strains, as defined in criteria laid down by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use(CHMP) for flu vaccines produced in cell culture.
The CHMP noted that the immune system's response to Synflorix was comparable to that of the comparator vaccine, which is also authorised for the protection of children against S. pneumoniae in the EU.
In the children 2-10 years of age, as well as ineach age strata(2-5 and 6-10 years), immune response as measured by percentage of subjects with seroresponse, hSBA≥1:8 and GMTs were not only non-inferior to comparator vaccine ACWY-PS, but all were statistically higher than the comparator for all serogroups and all immune measurements at 1 month post vaccination.
In a study of 1,279 children, M-M-RVaxPro triggered the same level of immune response as a comparator vaccine, with more than 98% of vaccinated patients having sufficient levels of antibodies against the three viruses.
In the study,children who received Hexacima produced a similar antibody response to those who received a comparator vaccine(Infanrix hexa), when given as a two-dose schedule followed by a booster 6 months later.