Примери за използване на Cross-border institutions на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The second lesson is that, among cross-border institutions, there is a special, singular type: those known as systemic institutions. .
Furthermore, the closer integration of supervisory and resolution arrangements for cross-border institutions will have to be organized in advance.
It stressed the need for a Union-wide framework to manage banks in financial distress and recommended moving toward greater integration and coherence in the resolution requirements andarrangements applicable to cross-border institutions.
However, what we have seen is that financial supervision involving major cross-border institutions in a single internal market is simply no longer working at national level.
The absence of harmonised Union rules creates uncertainty for issuing institutions and investors alike andis likely to make the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
The agreement combines a power-sharing arrangement in Northern Ireland with cross-border institutions that link Belfast and Dublin and thus recognizes the so-called Irish dimension of the conflict.
The absence of harmonised Union rules creates uncertainty for issuing credit institutions, investment firms and investors alike andmakes the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
The proposal of the ECON committee to hand control of cross-border institutions to the authorities is an option which poses political and technical problems that I suggest you should not ignore.
The absence of harmonised Union rules in respect of the implementation of the TLAC standard in the Union creates additional costs and legal uncertainty andmakes the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions and entities more difficult.
The Authority shall lead in ensuring a consistent and coherent functioning of colleges of supervisors for cross-border institutions across the Union, taking account of the systemic risk posed by financial market participants referred to in Article 23.
(3) The absence of harmonised Union rules in respect of the implementation of the TLAC standard in the Union would create additional costs and legal uncertainty▌and make the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
The Authority shall lead inensuring a consistent and coherent functioning of colleges of supervisors for cross-border institutions across the Union, taking account of the systemic risk posed by financial market participants referred to in Article 23.
In particular the ESRB shall, in collaboration with the ESAs, develop a common set of quantitative and qualitative indicators(risk dashboard),which will serve as the basis to assign a supervisory rating to cross-border institutions that potentially could pose a systemic risk.
There also needs to be better coordination between managing authorities and existing cross-border institutions like Euroregions during the implementation of cross-border programmes, so as to guarantee that projects have a high level of quality, transparency and closeness to the citizen.
The absence of harmonised rules in the Member States participating in the Single Resolution Mechanism(SRM) in respect of the implementation of the TLAC standard creates additional costs and legal uncertainty andmakes the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions and entities more difficult.
The Authority shall lead inensuring a consistent and coherent functioning of colleges of supervisors for cross-border institutions across the Union, taking account of the systemic risk posed by financial institutions referred to in Article 23, and shall, where appropriate, convene a meeting of a college.
(3) The absence of harmonised rules in the Member States participating in the Single Resolution Mechanism(SRM) in respect of the implementation of the TLAC standard would create additional costs and legal uncertainty▌ and make the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
Our financial markets are integrated at a European level andin every country the main financial institutions are cross-border institutions, but financial supervision has remained only at national level.
There are scores of international,inter-city, cross-border institutions, networks of cities in which cities are already, quite quietly, below the horizon, working together to deal with climate change, to deal with security, to deal with immigration, to deal with all of those tough, interdependent problems that we face.
Last but not least, let me emphasise that all the elements of the European financial stability framework,as well as the resolution regime for cross-border institutions, should be adopted urgently to reduce uncertainty and fragilities in the banking sector.
As the national rules adopted so far diverge significantly, there is a broad agreement among stakeholders and Member States that having divergent approaches to the statutory insolvency ranking of bank creditors provides uncertainty for issuers andinvestors alike and makes more difficult the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions.
The Authority shall lead in ensuring a consistent and coherent functioning of colleges of supervisors for cross-border institutions across the Union, taking account of the systemic risk posed by financial institutions referred to in Article 23, and shall, where appropriate, convene a meeting of a college.”;
(3) The absence of harmonised rules in the Member States participating in the Single Resolution Mechanism(SRM) in respect of the implementation of the TLAC standard creates additional costs andlegal uncertainty▌ and makes the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions and entities more difficult.
My aim is to give supervisory bodies andthe future resolution committee for these cross-border institutions a toolbox in order to take preventative measures and to prevent risks that are diagnosed fairly early on from turning into crises, and to prevent the crises themselves from turning into catastrophes.
Parliament anticipated more than 10 years ago that liberalising the markets, without putting in place European supervision mechanisms at the same time, would lead to acrisis in the system, for one very simple reason: cross-border institutions cannot be supervised by national authorities whose jurisdiction ends at their borders.
We need to make improvements, we need executive power,we need more European supervision where cross-border institutions are concerned and we need to achieve better coordination between the Member States, the Commission and the European Central Bank in the Basel Committee, because otherwise, a parallel structure will be created.
The European Banking Authority(EBA) should be vested with a clear role to issue guidelines and technical standards to ensure consistent applicationof the resolution powers, to participate in resolution planning in relation all cross-border institutions, and to carry out binding mediation between national authorities in the event of disagreement on the application of the framework.
The Authority shall lead in ensuring a consistent and coherent functioning of colleges of supervisors for cross-border institutions across the Union, taking account of the systemic risk posed by financial institutions referred to in Article 23, and shall, where appropriate, convene a meeting of a college.”;"▌.
The failure of a cross-border institution is likely to affect the stability of financial markets in the different Member States in which it operates.
Programme results: increased level of coordination of public institutions in cross-border area.