Примери за използване на Deprez на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Question asked by: Jason Deprez.
The meeting was presided by MEP Gerard Deprez, chairman of the Friends of a Free Iran inter-parliamentary group in the European Parliament.
What is important is to take action, andI echo what Mr Deprez said.
Therefore I would like once again to express my sincere thanks to Mr Deprez for his strenuous efforts at stopping us from crossing certain barriers.
Mr President, I wish, of course, to thank the three rapporteurs, andI will first of all turn to Mr Zwiefka and Mr Deprez.
Mr Deprez, this would be an opportunity to include Parliament in the work of the expert groups that we will be putting in place this year and in coming years.
(EL) Mr President, I too should like to take my turn in congratulating the three rapporteurs, Mr Zwiefka,Mr Deprez and Mrs Pagano.
Gérard Deprez(ALDE, Belgium) stated straight forward that he does not trust people, who speak European in Brussels and play the nationalist string in their own country.
This is a very sensitive area for all the institutions involved- Commission, Council,European Parliament- as Mr Deprez has highlighted so well.
Finally, Mr President, I would like to congratulate my fellow Members,Mr Deprez and Mr Zwiefka, and to thank the Commission and the Council for their willingness to work together with us on this issue.
I hope, Mr Deprez, that the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs might examine this text in the near future so that we can make progress with this new policy on asylum.
I would also like warmly to thank those Members who worked on this report, giving me ideas and, of course, bringing all their experience to bear, first and foremost Mr Demetriou, Mrs Ludford andthe excellent Mr Deprez.
I must also say that I have written to Mr Deprez, the chairman of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, to provide him with detailed information on the situation with SIS II.
The following spoke Cornelia Ernst, to request that amendments be put to the vote before the provisional agreement, under Rule 59(3),and Gérard Deprez(rapporteur), against the request.
Following the Justice and Home Affairs Councils in February and June 2009,I wrote to Mr Deprez, the chairman of Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, to inform him of how the work on SIS II was progressing.
I wish especially to thank Commissioner Barrot, who has supported us with kindness- I should say with his kindly authority- and I am also especially grateful to the chairman of our committee,Mr Deprez, and to all my colleagues.
I am veryfirm on this and I agree with what Mr Deprez said, when he pointed out that the Member States must not take advantage in this way of the situation to reclaim certain competences and to encourage the Commission to somehow abandon the idea of making proposals.
The report rightly highlights key issues like the need for monitoring implementation of legislation; boosting the training of judges, prosecutors and defence lawyers; and new legislation ensuring procedural safeguards,as Gérard Deprez has emphasised.
I would like to thank the rapporteur, Mr Deprez, for taking on this important subject influencing the lives of citizens living both inside and outside the EU, especially because this document achieves a balance between the legal jurisdiction of Community institutions and that of national states.
Mr President, Commissioner, firstly I would like to extend my very warm thanks for our successful work together to the rapporteur from the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice andHome Affairs, Mr Deprez, all the shadow rapporteurs, and the representatives of the Czech Presidency and the European Commission.
Mr President, the Chair of our Committee, Mr Deprez, spoke for so many of us in this House when he said that this was not a report about sectional interests or a report of the Left, but a report by Mrs Buitenweg, which was full of thoughtfulness, sensitivity and compromise where people were concerned.
Mr President, I believe that the proposals for regulations that have been submitted to us by the Commission are important and necessary and, on the other hand, it was also important and necessary for us in the European Parliament to insist on the principle that has been insisted uponby the two rapporteurs, Mr Zwiefka and Mr Deprez, which is the principle of Community competence.
The objective of the two proposals covered by the reports from Mr Zwiefka and Mr Deprez is to establish a procedure which will allow the Member States to negotiate and conclude agreements with third countries on aspects of judicial cooperation in civil matters falling within the exclusive competence of the Community.
It is true, too- Mr Zwiefka and Mr Deprez alluded to this- that we must think about the rules relating to divorce, the custody of children, access rights and maintenance obligations, and about the painful situations that can arise for want of legislation that is universally applicable to these areas, at international level.
I wanted to say that Mr Demetriou,Mrs Ludford and Mr Deprez hit the nail on the head; they identified the challenge faced by the European Union, because achieving a collective European judicial culture- which of course means seriously combating the factors mentioned by Mr Deprez- establishing the independence of the judiciary, providing guarantees and ironing out the disparities between the various judicial systems are the challenges that await us.