Примери за използване на Emetics на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The same doctor had duly supervised the administration of the emetics to the applicant.
His refusal to swallow the emetics was overcome by the use of considerable force.
The medical report did not expressly associate this condition with the forced administration of emetics.
The applicant had been administered harmless emetics in a hospital by a doctor acting lege artis.
Even assuming it is,the difference is not so great as to make it obligatory to exclude emetics.
Хората също превеждат
Even so, we do accept that the use of emetics carries health risks, as do many law-enforcement measures.
The side effects anddangers described by the applicant could only be caused by chronic abuse or misuse of the emetics in question.
She was, however, treated with milk and various emetics, and she eventually recovered enough to leave the hospital.”.
It is true that this alternative is not associated with an interference with the suspect?s physical integrity in the same way as the use of emetics.
There is no uniform practice on the use of emetics to secure evidence of a drugs offence in the German Länder.
Even though the emetics had been administered primarily to obtain evidence rather than for medical reasons, the removal of the drugs from the applicant? s stomach could still be considered to be required on medical grounds.
In the vast majority of cases suspects chose to swallow the emetics after being informed that force would be used if they refused to do so.
According to the survey emetics are forcibly administered to suspected drug dealers in practice in four countries(Luxembourg, Norway,“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and Germany).
However, he said that the Government had failed to adduce any evidence of emetics being administered by force against the accused's will in those member States.
However, it is a matter of dispute between the parties whether an anamnesis of the applicant was obtained prior to the execution of the measure in order to ascertain whether his health might be at risk if emetics were administered to him against his will.
The Government further maintained that the emetics were administered to the applicant only after an anamnesis had been obtained by a doctor in a hospital.
However that may be,we have no reason to believe that the doctor judging the situation could not reasonably conclude that the use of emetics was the appropriate way to proceed in the circumstances.
The suspect can choose to take emetics or a laxative if a medical examination discloses that it poses no risks to his health.
It also observes in this respect that the actual use of force- as opposed to the mere threat of force- has been found to be necessary in the respondent State in only a small proportion of the cases in which emetics have been administered.
It is then up to the suspect to decide whether to take emetics or a laxative if a medical examination shows that neither method entails a risk.
In other Länder, emetics are not forcibly administered, partly because, on the basis of medical advice, it is regarded as a disproportionate and dangerous measure, and partly because it is not considered a necessary means of combating drugs offences.
Since further delay might have frustrated the conduct of the investigation the public prosecutor ordered that emetics(Brechmittel) be administered to the applicant by a doctor in order to provoke the regurgitation of the bag(Exkorporation).
As to the manner in which the emetics were administered, the Court notes that, after refusing to take the emetics voluntarily, the applicant was pinned down by four police officers, which shows that force verging on brutality was used against him.
The anti-emetic efficacy of maropitant against central and peripheral emetics was demonstrated in experimental studies including apomorphine, cisplatin and syrup of ipecac(dogs) and xylazine(cats).
Furthermore, it is undisputed that the emetics were administered in the absence of any prior assessment of the dangers involved in leaving the drug bubble in the applicant's body.
When visited by the police in his cell two hours after being given the emetics, the applicant, who was found not to speak German, said in broken English that he was too tired to make a statement about the alleged offence.
In the vast majority of cases in which emetics have been used, the suspects chose to swallow the emetic themselves, after being informed that it would otherwise be administered forcibly.
Those medical experts who argue against the administration of emetics by force point out in particular that the forcible introduction of emetics through a nasogastric tube entails considerable health risks.
The accused's initial refusal to take the emetics could not be relevant, as otherwise all investigative measures aimed at breaking a suspect's will to conceal evidence, such as taking blood samples by force or searching houses, would be prohibited.
In view of the Government's explanation that the use of emetics is allowed only in those five Länder where the problem caused by drug offences is most acute we accept that the practice of using emetics does not go beyond what can be regarded as necessary.