Примери за използване на Eni's на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The plea accepted by the General Court was raised in Eni's application.
Accordingly, Eni's argument relating thereto must also be rejected as unfounded.
The second ground of appeal in support of Eni's appeal is divided, in essence, into two parts.
Since Eni's argument is unfounded, the judgment under appeal is not vitiated by any error in that regard.
Frederic Hauge, founder of the Bellona Foundation, a Norwegian environmental group,hopes low oil prices will scuttle Eni's grand plans and other offshore projects in the Arctic.
As you know recently Eni's director Paolo Scaroni proposed the two pipes to be united in one project.
Descalzi could not give a timeline for when the gas might hit the market, butsaid developments would be quick as the gas field was in close proximity to Eni's processing facilities.
ExxonMobil, which bought part of Eni's Mozambique assets last year, is also looking at another onshore LNG plant.
Most notable, Putin was able to use his relationship with Berlusconi to get Gazprom access to Italian state-linked energy giant ENI's assets throughout North Africa, particularly in Libya.
ENI's relationship with Libya reflects Rome's, which has had influence in what is currently Libya literally since the time of the Roman Empire.
Above all, in recital 388 to the contested decision,the Commission stated that Eni's prerogatives, as they appear in particular from the group's corporate governance rules, allowed Eni to control the essential aspects of the commercial policy of its subsidiaries.
Eni's argument that its subsidiary carried out a separate activity very far removed from the other activities was rejected by the General Court on the basis of a simple reference to its case-law.
Whether ENI loses access to Libyan energy because of safety concerns, supply interruptions or a new government in Tripoli that looks less than favorably on the company that stuck by Gaddafi through thick and thin, there is much risk andlittle opportunity ahead in ENI's future relations with Libya.
Finally, in the light of Eni's observations, the General Court was wrong to take the view that the Commission had not infringed the principle of sound administration.
Whether ENI loses access to Libyan energy because of safety concerns, supply interruptions or a new government in Tripoli that looks less than favorably upon the company that stuck by Gadhafi through thick and thin, there is much risk andlittle opportunity ahead in ENI's future relations with Libya.
Accordingly, Eni's arguments seeking to show that the amount of the fine for the payment of which it was held jointly and severally liable should have been limited to 10% of Syndial's turnover were ineffective(paragraph 178 of the judgment under appeal).
The General Court therefore did not commit any error when, in the judgment under appeal,it confirmed the Commission's reasoning that neither Eni's arguments dealt with expressly in recitals 382 to 398 to the contested decision nor the other arguments raised by Eni before the General Court can suffice to rebut the presumption in question.
In Eni's submission, the reasons given by the General Court are contradictory, given that the Commission had regarded Eni as liable only as a result of its role as parent company and not because it had been aware of the conduct in question.
Moreover, in so far as Eni in fact was attempting to challenge the validity of the presumption of actual decisive influence of a parent company over its wholly or almost wholly-owned subsidiary, the General Court did not err in referring to its findings relating to that question and holding that Eni's arguments on that subject were based on an incorrect premiss.
The Guarantor for privacy has been applied to Eni's Gas and Light(Egl) two penalties, for a total of 11.5 million euro, relating to unlawful processing of personal data in the context of promotional activities and activation of the contracts are not required.
The Interfax agency cited Gazprom's external economic affairs department chief Stanislav Tsigankov,who angrily accused the Italian company Eni of blocking“South stream”:“There is nothing constructive from them, no evidence of work… Not to mention the payments on their side, we still pay for everything ourselves” Tsigankov refused to comment if Eni's position on“South stream” was related to the alternative project-“Nabucco” in any way.
Consequently, Eni's complaints relating to an alleged infringement of Article 47 of the Charter and Article 6 of the ECHR and an alleged unjustified difference in treatment based solely on the level of participation by a parent company in its subsidiary are admissible.
In the present case,it is clear that the detailed reasons regarding Eni's liability for the infringement at issue, given by the Commission in recitals 382 to 398 to the contested decision, meet the requirements of the case-law cited in the preceding paragraph.
Due to Eni's reluctance to take a greater funding exposure than previously agreed due to the sanctions imposed after the annexation of Crimea, the South Stream project was cancelled by both Gazprom and Eni in November 2014, and the Kremlin decided to supply the Italian and Swiss market via Germany.
As the General Court held, in essence,in paragraph 117 of the judgment under appeal, Eni's liability in the present case does not arise out of a situation of succession of undertakings, given that, at the time of the infringement, Eni had total or almost total control of its subsidiaries, which has not been disputed.
The same is true of Eni's complaint that the presumption of liability arising from 100% control would lead to an unjustified difference in treatment as between the general situation of non-absolute control by the parent company and situations in which the parent company holds 100% of the capital in its subsidiary.
Points out that the ENI's successor should take account of the increased emphasis on democratisation, stabilisation, peace processes, post-crisis reconstruction and resilience, in both the East and the South, as well as provide increased support to growth and employment, particularly for young graduates;
Finally, the General Court also rejected Eni's argument that the undertakings concerned held only a small part of the whole BR and ESBR market, that argument being‘based on a market including those two products as well as natural rubber, which was not referred to by the contested decision'(paragraph 144 of the judgment under appeal).
Furthermore, in Eni's submission, the conclusion reached by the General Court in paragraph 102 of the judgment under appeal that the fact that Eni held only indirectly 100% of the capital of the undertakings active in the production of BR and ESBR did not, in itself, show that Eni and the undertakings at issue did not form a single economic entity is not sufficiently supported by reasoning and runs counter to the case-law of the General Court itself.
The South Stream pipeline- jointly funded by Gazprom,Italy's Eni, France's EdF and Germany's Wintershall- was conceived in 2007.