Примери за използване на I therefore propose на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
I therefore propose an energy union.
I therefore propose that we proceed to the vote.
In the discussion paper referred to earlier, at paragraph 80 the Commission requires that the conduct be necessary for reasons of safety or health;this escape route for domin- ant undertakings strikes me as too narrow and I therefore propose a broader one, linked to the market.
I therefore propose to examine them together.
In the light of those factors, the General Court in my view fully examined the admissibility of Telefónica's pleas for annulment and I therefore propose that the Court should reject as unfounded the single plea alleging infringement of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
I therefore propose that the Court give the following ruling.
In the horizontal report, I therefore propose, among other things, that we make fixed reductions when the agencies do not use a sufficient proportion of a budget or when they are unable to fill all positions.
I therefore propose that this vote be postponed under Rule 177(4).
I therefore propose to address the third question before the second question.
I therefore propose that the Court uphold the first ground of appeal.
I therefore propose that, in answer to the questions referred, the Court should rule as follows.
I therefore propose that the Court follow a similar line of reasoning to that of the ECtHR.
I therefore propose that the Court of Justice assign the Commission's submissions to three major subject areas.
I therefore propose that the fourth question referred for a preliminary ruling should be rejected as inadmissible.
I therefore propose adding the following phrase to this paragraph: as it is the fact in the S&D Group.
I therefore propose that this identity marking be taken to Doha as a useful contribution to the debate.
I therefore propose that Parliament should approve these agreements, whilst asking the Council and Commission for firm commitments.
I therefore propose that the European Union should organise a monitoring mission as quickly as possible, along the lines of the work we did in the Balkans.
I therefore propose that the Court should reply(…)[that] these operations are exempt from tax under section 135, paragraph 1, point e of the VAT Directive.”.
I therefore propose that the Court should reject the third part of the Slovak Republic's third plea and the first part of its fourth plea, and Hungary's fifth plea, as unfounded.
I therefore propose that the national states, by nationalising their national banks, advocate printing money, or vouchers corresponding to money, to finance small businesses.
I therefore propose that the Court's answer to the referring court should be that Article 81 EC, Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as.
I therefore propose that the Court should reject the fourth plea raised by Telefónica, alleging infringement by the General Court of the State of the Court of Justice of the European Union, as inadmissible.
I therefore propose that impact assessments be carried out before, during and after the negotiations and that they no longer cover just sustainable development but also look at the issue of human rights.
I therefore propose combating this monopoly situation with the means provided by and the authority of the Commission, along with the enforcement of the Charter on Freedom of the Press, backed up by European authority.
I therefore propose that the Court should dismiss the Commission's action for failure to fulfil obligations as unfounded and order the Commission to pay the costs, under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure.
I therefore propose to the Court to answer the questions referred in the present cases that Directive 2009/73 as interpreted in the Federutility case-law does not preclude national measures, such as those in question in the main proceedings.
I therefore propose extending the protection against dismissal to 12 months, removing the obligation to perform night work and overtime if the woman so wishes, and reducing the working day by two hours for the purpose of breastfeeding, without the loss of any privileges.
I therefore propose that the Court should answer Question 3 to the effect that Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as including all actions which seek to establish the liability of a defendant and are not related to a contract within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation No 44/2001.