Примери за използване на Internet intermediaries на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Liability of internet intermediaries.
Recommendation on the roles and responsibilities of Internet intermediaries.
The role of Internet intermediaries in protecting intellectual property rights.
European efforts to regulate internet intermediaries.
Develop standards on the role of Internet intermediaries with regard to freedom of expression, taking into account best practices on blocking, filtering and takedown of Internet content;
Roles, responsibilities and liability of internet intermediaries.
Nowadays we are constantly witnessing how diverse Internet intermediaries are rapidly evolving to perform a variety of important social and economic functions.
EBU welcomes new Recommendation on the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries.
The liability of Internet intermediaries.
Calls on the Commission to investigate the extent andimpact of this transfer of value to internet intermediaries;
Article 13- responsibility of Internet intermediaries to filter user.
The Council of Europe has published a Recommendation to Member States on the roles and responsibilities of Internet intermediaries.
States should not exert pressure on internet intermediaries through non-legal means.”.
On 7 March 2018 the Committee of Ministers has adopted the Recommendation on the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries.
The process of enacting legislation applicable to internet intermediaries should be transparent and inclusive.
Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries(2018).
Emphasises the shared responsibility of lawmakers, journalists,publishers and internet intermediaries, but also of citizens as consumers of information;
Though not legally binding,this declaration is a very clear and strong political message against legal uncertainty for internet intermediaries.
The Council of Europe recommendation deals with the functions of the Internet intermediaries predominantly from a human rights' perspective in accordance with the profile of the organization drawing attention to both their non-commercial and commercial activities.
The Council of Europe adopted on 7 March 2018 policy guidelines on the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries such as search engines and social media.
However, the latter has the advantage to signal the problems of the Internet intermediaries to its 47 member states some of which are not members of the EU club and potentially the act may have wider repercussions in the European policy and legislative areas.
For this purpose- we need to emphasise the SHARED RESPONSIBILITY of lawmakers, journalists,publishers and Internet intermediaries, but also of citizens as consumers of information.
The Recommendation begins with a Preamble,setting out the functions of Internet intermediaries, which are a wide, diverse and rapidly evolving range of players that facilitate interactions on the Internet between natural and legal persons by offering and performing a variety of functions and services.
In a statement on April 13, the OSCE representative, Harlem Desir, said the decision to block Telegram“hampers the important role of Internet intermediaries in facilitating the exercise of the right to freedom of expression.”.
Any request, demand orother action by public authorities addressed to internet intermediaries must, in line with the European Convention on Human Rights, be prescribed by law, be exercised within the limits of the law and constitute a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society.
These two instruments may complement each other to assist states in the setting up of workable regulatory frameworks by stressing different aspects of the regulation of the Internet intermediaries in a complex environment.
To ensure that the IPR chapter does not include provisions on the liability of internet intermediaries or on criminal sanctions as a tool for enforcement, as having been previously rejected by Parliament including the proposed ACTA treaty;
Any request, demand orother action by public authorities addressed to internet intermediaries that interferes with human rights and fundamental freedoms must be prescribed by law, must be exercised within the limits conferred by law and must constitute a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society.
Hundreds of stakeholders were brought together to engage in critical conversations about the nature andscope of the responsibilities of internet intermediaries, their relationship with states and other non-state actors, including traditional media actors and civil society organisations, in order to foster the adoption and implementation of corresponding policies consonant with international standards.
Under the framework of the recommendation the Internet intermediaries are obliged to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, privacy and data protection in particular, and restrict access(including blocking or removing content) as a result of a State order or request using the least restrictive means in content moderation.