Примери за използване на Less democracy на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
At the same time, we have less democracy.
So that- less democracy but more eggs for the people!
The answer is more, not less, democracy.
And rather than less democracy, we need more democracy.
Now, there is less freedom, and there is less democracy.
It is better to have less democracy, provided everyone's better off.
Turkey- Europe: Privileged partnership- less democracy?
The real, sustainable road of development means more, not less democracy,” Rosen Plevneliev said and added that integration in Europe is of key importance for ensuring progress.
A system can also be only more or less democracy.
The real, sustainable road of development means more, not less democracy,” Rosen Plevneliev said and added that integration in Europe is of key importance for ensuring progress.
The real, sustainable road of development means more, not less democracy.
A world without US primacy,” Samuel Huntington once wrote,“will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.”.
He said,“No, the cure for this democracy is less democracy.”.
As the late Samuel Huntington observed,“A world without U.S. primacy will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.
What can be said, however,is that more democracy is better than less democracy.
I think that this quote is from the Samuel P. Huntington who said,"A world without U.S. primacy will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.
There is something of a paradox when it comes to democratisation in the Islamic world, where more democracy often leads to more Islamism,which in turn leads to less democracy.
What we need, in other words, is not less democracy, but more.
Amid growing fears of division of the EU into two gears- the euro area and the rest- and fears that the euro area could break up or, at least, the weakest countries to drop out, the Commission President clearly stated that he opposed the division of the EU and the eurozone, that euro governance should be done within the framework of the existing institutions andthat ceding more powers to the European institutions did not mean less democracy.
Yet what is really needed is not less democracy, but more of it.
Therefore it is important to work so as to ensure justice and progress, modernization and development, andpromote more not less democracy and tolerance in society.
So they will vote for more stability and less democracy, which is unfortunate.
The other major crisis, of which we are much less aware, is what I see as a crisis of democracy and legitimacy, linked to the fact that we are able to take more and more decisions not in the nation state but beyond it, the result of which,as this is associated not with more but with less democracy, is that we lose the consent and the acceptance of the people.
As Huntington warned a quarter-century ago when democracy seemed triumphant,a world without U.S. leadership"will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.
In the President's words, Europe has faced serious challenges like the current ones more than once andthe solutions are clear:“We need more, not less democracy, humanness and sympathy; observing rules; integration and education.”.
A couple of decades ago, during that famous vacation from history,Sam Huntington warned that a world without U.S. leadership“will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.”.
Initially he contents himself with citing Harvard professor and doyen of American foreign policy studies Sam Huntington:“A world without U.S. primacy will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.”.
As Samuel Huntington wrote five years ago, before he joined the plethora of scholars disturbed by the"arrogance" of American hegemony:"A world without U.S. primacy will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country shaping global affairs.".
They are less approving of the shifts to democracy and capitalism, less supportive of specific democratic principles and less satisfied with their lives.
Now there's more democracy, less dictatorship.