Примери за използване на Lesser duty на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Such a lesser duty shall not apply in any of the following circumstances.
In some cases, the EU will adapt its"lesser duty rule" and may impose higher duties. .
In some cases they will also result in higher duties, thanks to an adaptation of the existing‘lesser duty rule'.
Dumping- Imports of salmon originating in Norway- Lesser duty rule- Calculation of minimum import prices and fixed duties. .
Therefore, the lesser duty rule should not apply when the complaint has been presented on behalf of a sector largely composed of SMEs.
The changes enable the EU to impose higher duties in some cases by changing the‘lesser duty rule';
Notably the removal of the so-called lesser duty rule in certain circumstances would allow imposing higher anti-dumping duties. .
Measures were imposed at injury level(on average 47.6%), which is lower than the dumping level(an average of 88%),thus applying the so-called'lesser duty rule'.
Therefore, the lesser duty rule should not apply in such cases, when the exporting country has an insufficient level of social and environmental standards.
After all, the dumping andthe injury margin are compared for the application of the lesser duty rule under Articles 7(2) and 9(4) of the basic Regulation.
The changes coming into force tomorrow, aimed at modernising the EU's trade defence toolbox,enable the EU to impose higher duties in some cases by changing the‘lesser duty rule';
However, such a lesser duty shall always be granted when structural raw materials distortions are found to exist with regard to the product concerned in the exporting country and that country is a least-developed country listed in Annex IV to Regulation(EU) No 978/2012.
The Committee also notes that the efficiency of trade defence instrument(TDI) procedures is also linked to the 2013 proposal to modernise TDI,including the lesser duty rule.
However, such a lesser duty shall always be granted when structural raw materials distortions are found to exist with regard to the product concerned in the exporting country and such country is a least-developed country listed in Annex IV to Regulation(EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
Definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC, in accordance with the lesser duty rule stipulated in Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
In view of the use of the lesser duty rule and the fact that the definitive subsidy margins are lower than the injury elimination level, it was considered appropriate, pursuant to Article 15 of the basic anti-subsidy regulation, to impose such duties at the level of the established definitive subsidy margins and then to establish a definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.
The amount of the anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping established butit should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Community industry.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping duties should be imposed in respect of imports originating in the USA at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins,in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
The amount of the anti-dumping duty is not to exceed the margin of dumping established butit should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Community industry.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed in respect of imports originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins,in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
(2a) Takes note of the Council agreement to modernise the EU'strade defence instruments but recalls that in order to have effective anti-dumping measures, the Lesser Duty Rule unjustly reduces the anti-dumping duties at a level below the dumping margin.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, andin accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on the imports of the product concerned at the level of the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
For that purpose and,as proposed by the European Parliament in its position adopted at first reading on 16 April 2014 relating to the modernisation of TDIs, the lesser duty rule should be removed, the trade defence proceedings should be accelerated, provisional duties should be imposed, and trade unions and SMEs should be allowed to submit anti-dumping complaints.
Should a Party decide to impose a provisional or definitive anti-dumping or countervailing duty, the amount of such duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping or countervailable subsidies, butit should be less than the margin if such a lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.
In view of the use of the lesser duty rule, and the fact that the definitive amounts of countervailable subsidies expressed on ad valorem basis are in some cases lower than the injury elimination level, the Commission will impose the definitive countervailing duty at the level of the established definitive amounts of countervailable subsidies and then impose the definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.”.
The amount of the provisional anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping as provisionally established, butit should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Union industry.
According to that provision, where the facts as finally established show that there is dumping and injury caused thereby, and the EU interest calls for intervention, a definitive anti-dumping duty is to be imposed by the Council and the amount of the anti-dumping duty is not to exceed the margin of dumping established andshould even be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the EU industry.
(2 a) In view of the Council agreement to modernise the Union's trade defence instruments(TDIs) and in order tohave effective anti-dumping measures, it is necessary to take into account that the lesser duty rule unjustly reduces the anti-dumping duties at a level below the dumping margin.
Should a Party decide to impose a provisional or a definitive anti-dumping or countervailing duty, the amount of such duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping or the total amount of countervailable subsidies, but it should be less than the margin of dumping orthe total amount of countervailable subsidies if such a lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.
The amount of the provisional anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping as provisionally established, butit should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Union industry.