Примери за използване на Lyocell на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Lyocell Fabric From China.
Tencel is the trademark name for lyocell.
Tencel Lyocell Fabric/ Textile.
Tencel is a registered trade name of lyocell.
The manufacturing of lyocell fiber does have significant environmental and ecological benefits.
Renewable cellulose-based material from raw material of wood(lyocell).
REFIBRA™ Lyocell is a fibre made from recycled cotton and wood sourced from sustainably-managed forests.
Together with Verychi we picked one of the finest fabrics at the moment- lyocell.
Therefore the high quality products from lyocell do not contain chlorine and are sold as so-called TSF products.
Bed linen made of natural fabrics- 100% cotton, cotton satin,percale, lyocell, linen.
For this reason, high-quality Lyocell products contain no free chlorine and are sold as so-called“TCF- products”.
First, in its application,[Sniace] alleges, in essence,that viscose and lyocell are in direct competition with each other.
Bed linen BOLLTISTEL made of lyocell and satin cotton will help to refresh the interior of your bedroom without much effort. 6.
All products manufactured with sustainable raw materials like ecologically-grown cotton,TENCEL® lyocell or recycled fabrics.
Lyocell®(CLY) is a cellulose chemical fibre and especially shiny thanks to its environmentally friendly mode of manufacture.
LLG's business also includes production and sale of lyocell, a new type of synthetic fibre made from pure natural cellulose.
In that regard,it must be stated that the evidence in the file does not establish the existence of different qualities of lyocell.
Lyocell then comes out as long thin fibers which are subjected to further chemical processes followed by washing and drying process before being compressed.
We work with natural fabrics including linen, silk, cotton and wool, as well as synthetics/polyester/ and sustainable,bio-degradable fabrics such as lyocell.
Secondly, the applicant invokes the existence of, besides“pure lyocell” and proviscose,“sub-standards of lyocell” which it also describes as lyocell of“lower quality”.….
The content of that document cannot therefore call into question the conclusion arrived at by the Court of First Instance that there was no direct competition between viscose and lyocell.
The appellant claims that LLG introduced onto the market different types of lyocell, of lower quality and lower price, known as‘lyocell sub-standards', which were in competition with the viscose fibre for certain applications.
The fact that Sniace belongs to a‘closed circle' of undertakings which are potential competitors of LLG,namely the undertakings active in the cellulose fibres sector(lyocell, viscose and modal); and.
While production of lyocell fibers is generally eco-friendly and environmentally sustainable, the transformation of lyocell fibers into fabric and garments can use many or the same harsh, and even toxic, chemicals and processes used in conventional garments.
In addition, that same article, as the Court of First Instance observed at paragraph 67 of the judgment under appeal, states that,in comparison with viscose, lyocell constitutes‘an additional fibre whose applications are different'.
Even assuming that LLG produces inferior quality lyocell which it sells at extremely low prices, the applicant has not at all substantiated its argument that, as a result, it had to lower its prices for“products of the same quality”.
The statements contained in that note are based, in fact, on completely unsupported assumptions,such as the fact that LLG's production of lyocell has, since 1997, completely replaced that of viscose and that it is intended exclusively for the European market.
OIH owns many prestigious and well-known brands such as“Threegun”,“Lily”,“Prolivon”,“Yi Jia” and“Milky Way”,with about 4,000 stores(channels) nationwide, as well as high-tech fibres with independent intellectual property rights such as Bamboo Lyocell and PSA.
The appellant's first criticism of the Court of First Instance is that it did not take account of certain information which established that the lyocell fibre produced and marketed by LLG competed directly with the viscose fibre produced and marketed by Sniace.
The appellant asserts that it did submit such evidence, in particular by production of a document, namely Annex 14 to its application at first instance,containing precise data on the losses suffered by Sniace as a result of the marketing of lyocell at an artificially low price.