Примери за използване на Mean absolute change на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Mean absolute change from baseline in BMI(kg/m2).
The% LDL-C reduction at week 24 corresponds to a mean absolute change of.
Mean absolute change from baseline in body weight(kg).
Numbers above the bars represent the mean absolute changes and the error bars are 1 SE.
Mean absolute change from baseline in CFQ-Rb respiratory domain score(points)c.
For the endpoints listed, absolute change from baseline is the mean absolute change from baseline at Week 24.
The mean absolute change from baseline through week 8 in percent predicted FEV1(primary efficacy endpoint) was 7.5% in the ivacaftor period and -3.2% in the placebo period.
The primary endpoint was improvement in lung function as determined by the mean absolute change from baseline at Day 56 in ppFEV1.
The mean absolute change from baseline through Week 24 in percent predicted FEV1 was -2.8 percentage points in the ivacaftor group and 3.5 percentage points in the placebo group.
In study 8 in patients with CF aged less than 24 months, the mean absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride was -67.9 mmol/L95% CI -77.6.
The mean absolute change from baseline through week 24 in percent predicted FEV1(primary efficacy endpoint) was 2.57 percentage points in the ivacaftor group and 0.46 percentage points in the placebo group.
The primary efficacy endpoint in both studies was the mean absolute change from baseline in percent predicted FEV1 through 24 weeks of treatment.
The mean absolute change(SE) from baseline in BMI z-value was 0.24(0.07) kg/m2 in the Symkevi in combination with ivacaftor group, 0.20(0.07) kg/m2 in the ivacaftor group and 0.04(0.07) kg/m2 in the placebo group in Study 2.
In a subgroup analysis in patients with a confirmed R117H-5T genetic variant, the difference in the mean absolute change from baseline through Week 24 in percent predicted FEV1 between ivacaftor and placebo was 5.3%95% CI 1.3.
The mean absolute change(SE) from baseline in ppFEV1 was 11.7(1.2) percentage points in the Symkevi in combination with ivacaftor group, 7.6(1.2) percentage points in the ivacaftor group and -0.4(1.2) percentage points in the placebo group in Study 2.
At Day 15, the treatment difference between lumacaftor 400 mg/ivacaftor 250 mg q12h and placebo for the mean absolute change(95% CI) in ppFEV1 from baseline was 2.51 percentage points in the pooled Trials 1 and 2(P< 0.0001).
In addition, the mean absolute change in sweat chloride from Week 24 at Week 26 following the 2-week washout period(to evaluate off-drug response) was an increase of 33.0 mmol/L(95% CI: 28.9, 37.1; nominal P< 0.0001), representing a return to baseline after treatment washout.
The treatment difference between Symkevi(in combination with ivacaftor) andplacebo for the primary endpoint of mean absolute change(95% CI) in ppFEV1 from baseline through Week 24 was 4.0 percentage points(95% CI: 3.1, 4.8; P< 0.0001).
The treatment difference between ivacaftor and placebo for the mean absolute change(95% CI) in percent predicted FEV1 from baseline through Week 24 in patients 12 to 17 years of age in study 1 was 11.9 percentage points(5.9, 17.9).
In study 7 in patients aged 2 to less than 6 years with a gating mutation on at least 1 allele of the CFTR gene administered either 50 mg or75 mg of ivacaftor twice daily, the mean absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride was -47 mmol/L(95% CI -58, -36) at week 24.
Adolescent patients with CF who were homozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene The mean absolute change(SE) from baseline in ppFEV1 was 3.5(0.6) percentage points in the Symkevi in combination with ivacaftor group and -0.4(0.6) percentage points in the placebo group in Study 1.
Ivacaftor in a combination regimen with tezacaftor/ivacaftor In patients homozygous for the F508del mutation,the treatment difference between ivacaftor in combination with tezacaftor/ivacaftor and placebo in mean absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride through week 24, was -10.1 mmol/L(95% CI: -11.4, -8.8).
The treatment difference between ivacaftor and placebo for the mean absolute change(95% CI) in percent predicted FEV1 from baseline through Week 24 in patients with baseline predicted FEV1 greater than 90% in study 2 was 6.9 percentage points(-3.8, 17.6).
The treatment difference between Symkevi incombination with ivacaftor- and placebo-treated patients for the primary endpoint of mean absolute change in ppFEV1 from study baseline to the average of Week 4 and Week 8 was 6.8 percentage points(95% CI: 5.7, 7.8; P< 0.0001).
In a Phase 3 placebo-controlled study in patients with PAH, mean absolute changes in haemoglobin at regular visits compared to baseline ranged from- 0.34 to- 0.02 g/dL in the selexipag group compared to- 0.05 to 0.25 g/dL in the placebo group.
In Study 1(patients homozygous for the F508del mutation),the treatment difference between Symkevi in combination with ivacaftor and placebo in mean absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride through Week 24, was -10.1 mmol/L(95% CI: -11.4, -8.8; nominal P< 0.0001*).
In patients heterozygous for the F508del mutation and a second mutation associated with residual CFTR activity,the treatment difference in mean absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride through week 8 was -9.5 mmol/L(95% CI: -11.7, -7.3) between ivacaftor in combination with tezacaftor/ivacaftor and placebo, and -4.5 mmol/L95% CI: -6.7.
Table 5 shows the results of the mean(SD) absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 for both groups of patients.
However, in patients with the G970R-CFTR mutation, the mean(SD) absolute change in sweat chloride at Week 8 was -6.25(6.55) mmol/L.
In part 2 of study 5, the mean(SD) absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 following 16 weeks(patients randomised to the ivacaftor/placebo treatment sequence in part 1) of continuous ivacaftor treatment was 10.4%(13.2%).