Примери за използване на Median duration of follow-up на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Median duration of follow-up(months).
Survival update based on a median duration of follow-up at 60.1 months mo: months.
Median duration of follow-up was 77 months.
Due to this early crossover, the median duration of follow-up for surviving patients is 8.3 months.
The median duration of follow-up for these studies was 4.0, 3.0, 3.0, and 3.0 years for Protocol 005, Protocol 007, Protocol 013, and Protocol 015.
The final survival update was performed with a median duration of follow-up of 60.1 months.
The median duration of follow-up was 2.9 years.
EBMT criteria All randomised patients with secretory disease* Survival update based on a median duration of follow-up at 60.1 months mo: months.
The median duration of follow-up was 2.9 years.
The safety of Strimvelis was evaluated in 18 subjects, with a median duration of follow-up of 7 years.
The median duration of follow-up was 43 months.
EBMT criteria g All randomised patients with secretory disease* Survival update based on a median duration of follow-up at 60.1 months mo: months.
The median duration of follow-up was 0.8 years incidence.
There was one reported malignancy amongst 77 control patients(median duration of follow-up 0.8 years; incidence 1.3%[95% CI 0.03%- 7.0%]).
The median duration of follow-up for this study was 4.0 years.
Of 43 CP-CML patients, 31 CP-CML patients achieved a MCyR with a median duration of follow-up of 25.3 months(range: 1.7 to 38.4 months).
The median duration of follow-up in the trastuzumab arm was 3.8 years.
The efficacy results for relevant endpoints analysed at end of study(median duration of follow-up 2.4 years) in the per-protocol population are presented in the Table 5.
The median duration of follow-up for the combined protocols(005, 007, 013, and 015) was 3.6 years.
The efficacy results for relevant endpoints analysed at end of study(median duration of follow-up 2.4 years) in the per-protocol population are presented in the Table 5.
The median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months(from randomisation to data cut-off date).
The efficacy results for relevant endpoints analysed at 2 years post-enrolment andat end of study(median duration of follow-up= 3.6 years) in the per-protocol population are presented in the Table 2.
The median duration of follow-up was 8.6 years, and during this time, 18,882 participants developed lung cancer.
Of the 143 Aclasta-treated patients and 107 risedronate-treated patients who entered an extended observation study, after a median duration of follow-up of 18 months from time of dosing, 141 Aclasta-treated patients maintained their therapeutic response compared to 71 risedronate-treated patients.
The median duration of follow-up was 73 months, and the median duration of response has not been reached.
Of the 153 zoledronic acid-treated patients and 115 risedronate-treated patients who entered an extended observation study, after a median duration of follow-up of 3.8 years from time of dosing, the proportion of patients ending the Extended Observation Period due to the need for re-treatment(clinical judgment) was higher for risedronate(48 patients, or 41.7%) compared with zoledronic acid(11 patients, or 7.2%).
The median duration of follow-up(time from randomisation to last contact or death) was 2.83 years in the dabrafenib and trametinib combination arm and 2.75 years in the placebo arm.
Where golimumab use is described by dose, the median duration of follow-up varies(approximately 2 years for 50 mg dose, approximately 3 years for 100 mg dose) as patients may have switched between doses.
The median duration of follow-up was 28.75 months in the panobinostat+ bortezomib+ dexamethasone arm and 29.04 months in the placebo+ bortezomib+ dexamethasone arm.
Throughout this section, median duration of follow-up(approximately 4 years) is generally presented for all golimumab use.