Примери за използване на Merger regulation на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Merger regulation.
The EU's Merger Regulation.
France submitted a request pursuant to Article 22(1) of the EU Merger Regulation.
In accordance with the EU Merger Regulation, a concentration will be deemed to arise where either.
The specific conditions and thresholds are listed in Article 1(2) and 1(3)of the EC Merger Regulation.
Article 18 of the Merger Regulation is devoted to‘Hearing of the parties and of third persons', and in extract it reads as follows.
Austria submitted a referral request to the Commission pursuant to Article 22(1) of the EU Merger Regulation.
The European Commission has cleared under the EU Merger Regulation the acquisition of Bulgarian Telecommunications Company by AIG Capital Partners.
Calls on the Commission to consider a readjustment within the framework of the Merger Regulation;
(2) The term concentration used in the Merger Regulation covers various types of transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, and certain types of joint ventures.
The Community's system for monitoring this type of transaction has beengoverned by the merger regulation since 1990.
Calls on the Commission, in connection with a possible reform of the Merger Regulation, to examine carefully whether current assessment procedures take sufficient account of circumstances on digital markets;
The European Commission has prohibited Siemens' proposed acquisition of Alstom under the EU Merger Regulation.
Under the EU Merger Regulation, the Commission may impose fines up to 1% of the aggregate turnover of companies that, intentionally or negligently, supply incorrect or misleading information in a notification process.
The European Commission announced it has prohibited Siemens' proposed acquisition of Alstom under the EU Merger Regulation.
The concept of joint control is defined in Article 3(3) of the Merger Regulation on the basis of the possibility of exercising decisive influence over an undertaking, which is determined by both legal and factual considerations.
On preliminary examination,the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation.
The Commission has the duty to assess mergers andacquisitions involving companies with a turnover above certain thresholds(see Article 1 of the Merger Regulation) and to prevent concentrations that would significantly impede effective competition in the EEA or any substantial part of it.
On preliminary examination,the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation.
Article 2 of Council Regulation(EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 onthe control of concentrations between undertakings(1)(hereinafter: the‘Merger Regulation') provides that the Commission has to appraise concentrations within the scope of the Merger Regulation with a view to establishing whether or not they are compatible with the common market.
The proposed initiative is a technical reform within the existing framework of EU merger control as defined by the Merger Regulation.
The draft decision pursuant to Article 14(2) of the Merger Regulation(2) concludes in substance that Marine Harvest ASA(‘Marine Harvest'), by implementing a transaction amounting to the acquisition of sole control of Morpol ASA(‘Morpol') before notifying it to the European Commission, infringed the prior notification requirement and the‘standstill obligation' that follow respectively from Articles 4(1) and 7(1) of the Merger Regulation.
On preliminary examination,the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation.
In accordance with the Commission Notice on the concept full-function joint ventures,a joint venture may be considered to be concentration within the meaning of the Merger Regulation, where joint control is acquired by two or more parent companies.
Having examined the notification,the Commission has concluded that the notified operation does not fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation.
The guidance set out in this document draws and elaborates on the Commission's evolving experience with the appraisal of non-horizontal mergers under Regulation(EEC) No 4064/89 since its entry into force on 21 September 1990, the Merger Regulation presently in force as well as on the case-law of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.
On 31 March 2014, the Commission adopted a Statement of Objections(the‘SO'), in which it set out its preliminary view that Marine Harvest had infringed Articles 4(1)and 7(1) of the Merger Regulation.
For merger control proceedings conducted by the Commission, the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned are, insofar as is relevant here,specified in Article 18 of the Merger Regulation and in Article 13 of the Merger Implementing Regulation. .
This criterion is appraised by calculating the turnover of the participating undertakings to see whether it reaches the thresholds under Article 1(2)or 1(2) of the Merger Regulation.
As a matter of principle, the econometric model used by the Commission has to be disclosedto the undertakings concerned, and its essential features explained, in the statement of objections pursuant to Article 18(1) and(3) of the Merger Regulation and Article 13(2) of the Merger Implementing Regulation.