Примери за използване на Milevi на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
MILEVI apartment, 0.00 BGN Hissarya.
It is located northwest of vr. Milevi rocks.
The Milevi sisters then complained to the National Building Control Directorate.
Neighboring tourist sites:- H. Milevi rocks- 2.30h.
The Milevi sisters claimed 46,600 euros(EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.
Plot in Pancharevo,Kosanin Dol Street. Milevi rocks.
The Milevi sisters claimed EUR 25,000 each in respect of non pecuniary damage.
In 2004 was started a joint programme of“Milevi” Ltd. and Sting Ltd. for pharmacy furnishing.
In May 2000 a company rented a flat on the ground floor of entrance“B” of the block,below the flat of the Milevi sisters.
It seems that the Milevi sisters did not bring a claim against the persons operating the club.
That flat was located diagonally below both the flat of the Milevi sisters and that of the Evtimovi family.
The nuisances sustained by the Milevi sisters had been the most serious, owing to the location of their flat above the computer club.
After the club had moved to the other flat,which was closer to theirs, they had to endure the same interferences as the Milevi sisters.
In the meantime, on 13 October 2003, the Milevi sisters contested the building permit before the Sofia Regional Building Control Directorate.
The noise and the vibrations generated by them, both while inside the club and while entering or leaving the premises, could be clearly heard andfelt in the flats of the Milevi sisters and of the Evtimovi family.
The Milevi sisters asserted that after that they could hear telephones ringing and conversations, loud voices, moving of furniture and banging of doors.
According to the doctor, those health problems were due to the constant disturbance and noise caused by the club's operations, andgradually subsided after the Milevi sisters went to live elsewhere in June 2004.
Moreover, the Milevi sisters have not submitted evidence showing the level of disturbance which they suffered from that club's operations.
In the instant case,the Court finds that it is appropriate to distinguish between the nuisances coming from the office in the flat adjacent to that of the Milevi sisters, the nuisances coming from the electronic games club, and the nuisances coming from the computer club.
The Milevi sisters additionally complained about the passiveness of the authorities with regard to the electronic games club and the office in the flat adjoining theirs.
There is nothing to indicate that the factors which caused the Milevi sisters to wish to move out of the flat would necessarily diminish its value in the eyes of a prospective buyer intending to put it to non residential use.
The Milevi sisters have not put forward evidence showing that as a result of the operation of the office the level of noise in their flat has risen above acceptable levels.
In the meantime, the Milevi sisters made numerous complaints about the conversion to both the building control authorities and the police, apparently to no avail.
The Milevi sisters produced a certificate in which their general practitioner attested that from the middle of 2002 both of them started complaining of constant headaches, insomnia, irritability and anxiety, had high blood pressure, and had lost weight.
On an appeal by the Milevi sisters, on 5 April 2004 the Sofia City Court set that decision aside and instructed the Directorate to examine the challenge on the merits.
The Milevi sisters sought reimbursement of EUR 8,310 incurred in fees for fifty seven hours of work by their lawyer on the domestic proceedings, at EUR 50 per hour, and thirty nine hours of work by the same lawyer on the proceedings before the Court, at EUR 140 per hour.
The Government submitted that the Milevi sisters had failed to prove that their decision to sell their flat had a direct causal link with the violation of the Convention.
On 29 August 2003 the Milevi sisters complained about that to the Sofia Regional Building Control Directorate, saying that no assent had been sought from them under section 38 of the 2001 Territorial Organisation Act(see paragraphs 50 and 51 below).
In the meantime, on 1 September 2003, the Milevi sisters asked the Sofia City Court to exempt them from paying court fees for a tort claim which they intended to bring against the persons operating the club.
From August 2003 the Milevi sisters had in addition to endure the nuisances coming from the electronic games club, whose creation had entailed extensive works in the flat below theirs, with the pulling down of walls and the installation of high voltage electrical cabling and new windows.