Примери за използване на Monopoly on violence на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
A monopoly on violence.
The state has a monopoly on violence.
When the state is incapable of protecting its own citizens, it loses its monopoly on violence.
The monopoly on violence.
The state does have a monopoly on violence.
Such a state monopoly on violence, first of all, serves as a reassurance.
Israel doesn't have a monopoly on violence.
Governments have a monopoly on violence and governments have an additional responsibility to stand above party politics, in order to do what is right for the people.
Russia: Returning to a State Monopoly on Violence?
He believes no religion has a monopoly on violence, and his own experience in inter-religious dialogue has shown him that Muslims seek“peace and encounter.”.
They possess a legal monopoly on violence.”.
Can‘identity' explain the war in the Donbas, andhow can we accurately describe society's moods in a situation where the state loses its monopoly on violence?
Government Monopoly on Violence.
The Latin American state has lost its monopoly on violence.
The State has a monopoly on violence and force.
The armed forces implement the state monopoly on violence.
The State's monopoly on violence.
These tragedies can be averted by a state with a monopoly on violence.
This is an unprecedented war on freedom,a clear sign that the tyranny of the state will use its monopoly on violence(militarized police) to stomp on the liberties of its citizens and keep them in check, all under the illusion of freedom, safety, and security.
The first type of violence is legal, covered by‘State law', andgives the State the'monopoly on violence'.
In Ethiopia, not only is the state losing its monopoly on violence, it also has a healthy fear of the same.
The Mafia became an essential part of the social structure in the late 19th century because of the inability of the Italian state to impose its concept of law and its monopoly on violence in a peripheral region.
The insiders at the highest levels of government have extraordinary capability, extraordinary resources,tremendous access to influence, and a monopoly on violence, but in the final calculus there is but one figure that matters: the individual citizen.
Specifically, the idea that public religion causes violence authorizes the marginalization of those things called religion from having a divisive influence in public life, andthereby authorizes the state's monopoly on violence and on public allegiance.
Unlike in Hanseatic times,national governments today largely hold the monopoly on violence, meaning they set the rules.
At the same time, a reform of the security sector must restore the state's monopoly on violence, it says.
The state does not actually want a monopoly on violence.
The government ultimately holds a monopoly on violence.
No one race andno one religion has a monopoly on violence.
A reform of the security sector must restore the state's monopoly on violence, it says.