Примери за използване на Not to build на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
And in the history of metro construction this station became a clear example of how not to build.
I try not to build their ideal.
Last year, Canadian roboticists Clearpath Robotics promised not to build autonomous robots for military use.
Iran pledged not to build new heavy-water reactors for fifteen years.
China, the United States, Russia and European nations, among others,are all exploring whether or not to build a base or research station on the moon", he said.
Trump promises not to build skyscrapers in Greenland.
A significant element in their construction and decoration is the sense of proportion- the most important thing is not to build a too bulky construction.
Trump promises not to build giant skyscraper on Greenland.
Miles northwest of Angkor Wat,a 15th-century French girl also reportedly received a divine inspiration… not to build, but to lead men in war.
You were told not to build your house upon sand.
In addition, the Soviet Union had in the shortest possible time to block the passages of underground structures to access boats and not to build new bases such passages.
We warn people not to build their house on sand.
The actions of both the Committee and the Commission, combined with domestic legal pressure,resulted in a decision by the Polish authorities not to build the road through the Rospuda Valley.
Be especially careful not to build a wall near trees.
They promised not to build nuclear weapons, but the problem is that the very same centrifugals very same factory that can enrich uranium to low quantities for nuclear fuel can enrich it to high quantities for nuclear weapons.
A man is obliged to adapt, and not to build from himself a busy cone.
Iran has pledged not to build another heavy water reactor for 15 years.
Ask yourselves- where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways, not to build our bridges, our dams, our airports?
Iran also agreed not to build any additional heavy water reactors for 15 years.
How different from the example of the Gaza Arabs who, when foolishly given full control over the Gaza Strip by Israel,chose not to build hospitals and schools, but instead bunkers and missile launchers.
In this case, it is better not to build a bridge and think of alternatives to reach the other side.
A similar form of business organization allows relatively small companies to quickly launch activities relying on the famous trademark andready formula for conducting business, not to build a new business and create a brand from scratch in terms of high competition.
If we build an open kitchen,it is possible not to build a foundation, but simply to equip the site by covering it by 10-15 cm, i.e.
Zuckerberg effectively closed that door in March,when he announced his plan to pivot Facebook toward more private forms of communication and pledged not to build data centers in countries“that have a track record of violating human rights like privacy or freedom of expression.”.
Now Iran( who used to be bad, butnow they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad( still bad) as are the Russians( bad) who nowhave ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
Iran pledged not to enrich uranium above a concentration of 3.67% for 15 years and not to stockpile more than 300 kg of low-enriched uranium,as well as not to build new heavy-water reactors,not to accumulate heavy water and not to develop nuclear explosive devices.
At the same time, it took 10 years not to build the structure itself, but to build a road, dig the canal and other infrastructure works.
Iran pledged not to enrich uranium above the level of 3.67% for 15 years and maintain enriched uranium stockpiles at the level not exceeding 300 kg,as well as not to build new heavy-water reactors,not to accumulate heavy water and not to develop nuclear explosive devices.
Now Iran(who used to be bad, butnow they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad(still bad) as are the Russians(who, despite doing a good job, are considered bad) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.