Примери за използване на Nuclear weapons would на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Nuclear weapons would be rendered useless overnight.
A world without any nuclear weapons would have been wonderful.
Nuclear weapons would be their one guarantee of safety!
Previous PostPrevious“A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us.”.
The succinct answer of Senator John McCain is that although attacking Iran would be bad,an Iran with nuclear weapons would be worse.
Iran's nuclear weapons would be of immediate threat to Israel.
Which, if we were to have a massive exchange of nuclear weapons would leave most of our life on Earth extinguished.
A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us.”.
Citing“big strategic shifts in Asia” he argues“it is no longer clear that nuclear weapons would never make sense” to Australian defence.
A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us.”.
He further emphasized that any attack on the United States, or its allies, will be defeated,and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming.
Even limited use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic climatic consequences.
As Secretary Mattis has said,“Any attack on the United States oron our allies will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with the response that would be effective and overwhelming.”.
And any use of nuclear weapons would be met with an“effective and overwhelming” response.
This was because both sides were convinced that the use of nuclear weapons would cause the total destruction of both sides.
Any conflict involving nuclear weapons would have led to the collapse of the world system supported by both Moscow and Washington.
Any attack on the United States oron our allies will be defeated and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with the response that would be effective and overwhelming.
The use of tactical nuclear weapons would likely have begotten the use of strategic nuclear weapons… and the end of human civilization.
It would have started as a conventional war and nuclear weapons would be used, and finally chemical weapons. .
A commonsense approach to nuclear weapons would also place as much emphasis on securing existing stockpiles and weapons caches worldwide as it did on modernizing America's own nuclear arsenal.
Any attack on the United States orour allies will be defeated and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming," Mattis said.
Once the treaty has been ratified by 50 states,the ban on nuclear weapons would enter into force and become binding under international law for all the countries that are party to the treaty.
And there is pretty good, moderate but strong language that makes clear that any attempt by Russia orNorth Korea to use nuclear weapons would result in a massive consequence for them," Wolfsthal was quoted as saying by the newspaper.
The most obvious scenario for Israel to use nuclear weapons would be in response to a foreign nuclear attack.
He further emphasized that any attack on the United States, or its allies,will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming.
A war fought with hundreds or thousands of U.S. andRussian strategic nuclear weapons would ignite immense nuclear firestorms covering land surface areas of many thousands or tens of thousands of square miles.
The Trump administration claims that the production of“low-yield” nuclear weapons would increase America's deterrent power by providing more flexible means of countering an enemy attack.
The demise of the only US-Russia arms control pact limiting deployed nuclear weapons would make it harder for each to gauge the other's intentions, giving both incentives to expand their arsenals.
Nevertheless, even some observers andpolicymakers who accept that the Iranian regime is rational still worry that a nuclear weapon would embolden it, providing Tehran with a shield that would allow it to act more aggressively and increase its support for terrorism.