Примери за използване на Online intermediation services should на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Providers of online intermediation services should cooperate in good faith in facilitating the gathering of such data, where applicable.
(14 a) In general, submitting new orupdating goods or services to the online intermediation services should be considered clear affirmative action by the business user.
Providers of online intermediation services should ensure that the conditions for termination are always proportionate and can be exercised without undue difficulty.
When offering goods and services as a result of ranking influenced against remuneration or due to control by the provider,the provider of online intermediation services should inform about this fact by including the word“SPONSORED” or“AD” in the offering.
Providers of online intermediation services should also not be obliged to engage in mediation with business users who have made repeated unsuccessful mediation attempts.
However, such functionalities or interfaces can be directly connected or ancillary to certain online intermediation services and where this is the case,the relevant providers of online intermediation services should be subject to transparency requirements related to differentiated treatment based on these functionalities and interfaces.
(25) Providers of online intermediation services should bear a reasonable proportion of the total costs of the mediation, taking into account all relevant elements of the case at hand.
(16) In order to ensure that business users have sufficient clarity regarding where, and to whom, their goods or services are being marketed,providers of online intermediation services should ensure, towards their business users, the transparency of any additional distribution channels and potential affiliate programmes that they might use to market those goods or services. .
Online intermediation services should also be liable if they are the authors of misleading statements regarding the business users or the goods and services offered by the business users.
In order to capture the relevant services, online intermediation services should be defined in a precise and technologically-neutral manner.
Rather, the users of online intermediation services should have the possibility to express whether they are business users or not, and in the case of business users, fulfil their stricter obligations towards consumers.
In order tocapture the relevant services, online intermediation services should be defined in a precise and technologically-neutral manner.
However, a provider of online intermediation services should not be required to provide a statement of reasons for restrictions, suspensions or terminations insofar as it would infringe a legal or regulatory obligation.
The statement of reasons regarding the decision to restrict, suspend orterminate the provision of online intermediation services should allow business users to ascertain whether there is scope to challenge the decision, thereby improving the possibilities for business users to seek effective redress where necessary.
Rather, the users of online intermediation services should be required to indicate whether they are business users or not, and if so, fulfil their stricter obligations towards consumers.
Notwithstanding its voluntary nature, providers of online intermediation services should examine in good faith requests to engage in the mediation provided for in this Regulation.
Providers of online intermediation services should make use of these rights only upon explicit consent of the business user, if they have obtained a license from the business user or their licensee, or under applicable exceptions and limitations.
In order to ensure proportionality,providers of online intermediation services should, where reasonable and technically feasible, delist only individual goods or services of a business user.
Providers of online intermediation services should therefore be required to pass on the contents of the notification to the business user in cases where a decision to suspend or terminate the provision of its services following a notification from a third party, in order to allow the business user to easily refute obviously wrongful notices.
In general, submitting new goods or services, including software applications, to the online intermediation services should be considered to be clear affirmative action, resulting in the waiving, by the business user, of the notice period required for changes to the terms and conditions.
(21) Providers of online intermediation services should not restrict the ability of business users to offer the same goods and services to consumers under different or the same conditions through other intermediation services. .
To minimise the negative impact of such decisions on business users,providers of online intermediation services should also allow an opportunity to clarify the facts that led to that decision in the framework of the internal complaint-handling process, which will help the business user, where this is possible, to re-establish compliance.
Providers of online intermediation services should therefore also ensure that the terms and conditions are easily available at all stages of the contractual relationship, including to prospective business users at the pre-contractual phase, and that any modifications to those terms are notified to business users within a set notice period which is reasonable and proportionate in light of the specific circumstances and which is at least 15 days.
To ensure clarity and transparency for business users and for their better understanding,providers of online intermediation services should within their terms and conditions include general, or more detailed, information if they so wish, regarding the overall effects, if any, of those terms and conditions on the ownership and control of intellectual property rights of the business user.
The provider of online intermediation services should expect the modifications to terms and conditions to require the business user to make significant technical adjustments where, for example, entire features of the online intermediation service that business users had access to are removed or added, or where business users may need to re-program their goods and services to be able to continue operating on the platform.
Therefore, providers of online intermediation services should facilitate mediation by, in particular, identifying mediators with which they are willing to engage.
Providers of online intermediation services should therefore also ensure that the terms and conditions are easily available at all stages of the commercial relationship, including to prospective business users at the pre-contractual phase, and that any changes to those terms are notified on a durable medium to business users concerned within a set notice period which is reasonable and proportionate in light of the specific circumstances and which is at least 15 days.
Therefore, providers of online intermediation services should facilitate mediation by, in particular, identifying mediators established in the EU, with which they are willing to engage.
Therefore, providers of online intermediation services should facilitate mediation by, in particular, identifying at least two public or private mediators with which they are willing to engage.
Therefore, the provider of online intermediation services should provide the business user concerned with a statement of reasons on a durable medium, at least 30 days before the termination of the provision of the whole of its online intermediation services enters into effect.