Примери за използване на Operating effectiveness на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Testing the operating effectiveness of specific control procedures; and.
Moreover, inquiry alone is not sufficient to test the operating effectiveness of controls.
The goal is to ensure the continued operating effectiveness of the internal control system and provide a basis for reviewing and improving the internal control system.
The length of time during the audit period that the auditor is relying on the operating effectiveness of the control.
SOC 2 is an evaluation of the design and operating effectiveness of controls that meet the AICPA's Trust Services Principles criteria.
For example, the auditor might observe the procedures for opening the mail andprocessing cash receipts to test the operating effectiveness of controls over cash receipts.
When the auditor's risk assessment includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls, under ASA 330, the auditor needs to test those controls to support the risk assessment.
When the substantive procedures alone do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence,the auditor should perform tests of controls to obtain audit evidence about their operating effectiveness.
When the auditor's risk assessment includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls, the auditor should test those controls to support the risk assessment.
Consideration of audit evidence about these changes maysupport either increasing or decreasing the expected audit evidence to be obtained in the current period about the operating effectiveness of the controls.
When the auditor s risk assessment includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls, sufficient appropriate audit evidence will be obtained by testing controls to support the assessment.
When substantive audit procedures alone do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence, under ASA 330,the auditor needs to perform tests of controls to obtain audit evidence about their operating effectiveness.
Results of previous audits that involved evaluating the operating effectiveness of internal control, including the nature of identified deficiencies and action taken to address them.
For example, obtaining audit evidence about the implementation of a manually operated control at a point in time does not provide audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the control at other times during the period under audit.
In such circumstances, audit evidence about operating effectiveness may be obtained through enquiry in combination with other audit procedures such as observation or the use of CAATs.
When the auditor s assessment of the risk of material misstatement at the assertion level includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls, the auditor is required to perform tests of controls.
When the auditor obtains evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls as of or through an interim date, he or she should determine what additional evidence is necessary concerning the operation of the controls for the remaining period of reliance.
Systems are classified as being effective in mitigating the risk of error in transactions, partially effective(when there are some weaknesses affecting operational effectiveness) or not effective(when weaknesses are pervasive andthereby completely undermine operating effectiveness).
The auditor may, therefore, decide it is efficient to test the operating effectiveness of controls at the same time as evaluating their design and determining that they have been implemented.
Controls that have been implemented over journal entries and other adjustments effective controls over the preparation and posting of journal entries and other adjustments may reduce the extent of substantive testing necessary,provided that the auditor has tested the operating effectiveness of the controls.
Other things being equal, the more the internal auditor relies on the operating effectiveness of controls in risk assessment, the greater is the extent of the internal auditor's tests of controls, and hence the sample size is increased.
Under the Court's methodology systems are classified as being effective in mitigating the risk of error in transactions, partially effective(when there are some weaknesses affecting operational effectiveness) or not effective(when weaknesses are pervasive andthereby completely undermine operating effectiveness).
In these circumstances, the auditor could test the operating effectiveness of controls over the recording of unit sales in conjunction with tests of the operating effectiveness of controls over the processing of sales invoices.
Therefore, because generally, IT processing is inherently consistent, performing audit procedures to determine whether an automated control has been implemented may serve as a test of that control's operating effectiveness, depending on the auditor's assessment and testing of IT general controls, including computer security and program change control.
If the auditor plans to use audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls obtained in previous audits, the auditor shall include in the audit documentation the conclusions reached about relying on such controls that were tested in a previous audit.
In addition, the auditor may obtain audit evidence about classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures andrelated assertions and about the operating effectiveness of controls, even though such procedures were not specifically planned as substantive procedures or as tests of controls.
Other things being equal, the greater the reliance the auditor places on the operating effectiveness of controls in the risk assessment, the greater is the extent of the auditor s tests of controls(and therefore, the sample size is increased). thus, sample size will increase.
In addition, in performing risk assessment procedures, the auditor may obtain audit evidence about the relevant assertions related to classes of transactions, account balances,or disclosures and about the operating effectiveness of controls, even though such audit procedures were not specifically planned as substantive procedures or as tests of controls.
If the auditor plans to use audit evidence from a previous audit about the operating effectiveness of specific controls, the auditor shall establish the continuing relevance of that evidence by obtaining audit evidence about whether significant changes in those controls have occurred subsequent to the previous audit.
Because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, audit evidence about the implementation of an automated application control,when considered in combination with audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the entity's general controls(in particular, change controls), may also provide substantial audit evidence about its operating effectiveness. .