Примери за използване на Pasireotide intramuscular use на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Pasireotide intramuscular use n(%) N=176.
Table 1 Adverse reactions by preferred term for pasireotide intramuscular use.
The apparent clearance(CL/F) of pasireotide intramuscular use in healthy volunteers is on average 4.5-8.5 litres/h.
The study met its primary efficacy endpoint for both pasireotide intramuscular use doses.
Population PK analyses of pasireotide intramuscular use suggest that race does not influence PK parameters.
No clinical studies in subjects with liver impairment have been performed with pasireotide intramuscular use.
Pharmacokinetic steady state for pasireotide intramuscular use is achieved after three months.
Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to a starting dose of either 10 mg or 30 mg pasireotide intramuscular use every 4 weeks.
The starting dose was 40 mg for pasireotide intramuscular use and 20 mg for octreotide intramuscular use. .
In both studies, mean FPG andHbA1c levels peaked within the first three months of treatment with pasireotide intramuscular use.
Maximum allowed dose was 60 mg for pasireotide intramuscular use and 30 mg for octreotide intramuscular use. .
In study C2402, the only notable outlier was a QTcF value>480 ms in 1 patient in the pasireotide intramuscular use 40 mg group.
The safety profile of pasireotide intramuscular use was largely similar between the acromegaly and Cushing's disease indications.
FPG and HbA1c increases were dose-dependent, andvalues generally decreased following pasireotide intramuscular use discontinuation but remained above baseline values.
In healthy volunteers, pasireotide intramuscular use is widely distributed with large apparent volume of distribution(Vz/F> 100 litres).
The percentage of patients achieving biochemical control,including those patients with IGF-1< LLN was 25.9% in the pasireotide intramuscular use group and 0% in the octreotide intramuscular use group.
At month 25,48.6% of patients(36/74) in the pasireotide intramuscular use group and 45.7%(21/46) in the octreotide intramuscular use group achieved biochemical control.
A few cases of concurrent elevations in ALT greater than 3 x ULN and bilirubin greater than 2 x ULN have been observed with the subcutaneous formulation,however not in patients treated with pasireotide intramuscular use.
The elevations of fasting plasma glucose andHbA1c observed with pasireotide intramuscular use treatment are reversible after discontinuation.
The efficacy of pasireotide intramuscular use has been demonstrated in two phase III, multicentre studies in acromegaly patients and in one phase III, multicentre study in Cushing's disease patients.
The phase III clinical studies in acromegaly patients did not identify any clinically meaningful differences in the QT prolongation events between pasireotide intramuscular use and the somatostatin analogues which were tested as active comparator.
Following multiple monthly doses, pasireotide intramuscular use demonstrates approximately dose-proportional pharmacokinetic exposures in the dose range of 10 mg to 60 mg every 4 weeks.
In medically naïve patients(study C2305), the mean absolute increase in FPG andHbA1c was similar at most of the time points for all patients treated with pasireotide intramuscular use irrespective of baseline values.
A total of 198 patients were randomised to receive pasireotide intramuscular use 40 mg(n=65), pasireotide intramuscular use 60 mg(n=65) or active control(n=68).
In patients treated with pasireotide intramuscular use in whom reductions in GH and IGF-1 levels were observed, these changes occurred during the first 3 months of treatment and were maintained up to week 24.
In acromegaly, the safety assessment was made based on 491 patients who received pasireotide(419 patients received pasireotide intramuscular use and 72 received pasireotide subcutaneous use) in phase I, II and III studies.
The safety profile of pasireotide intramuscular use is consistent with the somatostatin analogue class, except for the higher degree and frequency of hyperglycaemia seen with pasireotide intramuscular use.
The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients achieving biochemical control(defined as mean GH levels< 2.5 μg/l and normalisation of sex- andage-adjusted IGF-1) at week 24 with pasireotide intramuscular use 40 mg or 60 mg versus continued treatment with active control(octreotide intramuscular use 30 mg or lanreotide deep subcutaneous injection 120 mg), separately.
Furthermore, a higher proportion of patients on pasireotide intramuscular use(18.5% and 10.8% for 40 mg and 60 mg, respectively) than active comparator(1.5%) achieved a reduction in tumour volume of at least 25%.
During the extension phase, 74 patients continued receiving pasireotide intramuscular use and 46 patients continued with octreotide intramuscular use treatment.