Примери за използване на Preventive war на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The doctrine of preventive war.
A preventive war is one that is triggered by a nation with the argument that another country is preparing to attack it.
Regime change,""simulated drowning,""preventive war.".
These are the people that still think that preventive war and regime change are appropriate policy options when done the“right” way.
They applaud his doctrine of preventive war.
Two lies that gave Washington an excuse to launch a“preventive war” that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people(including more than 2,000 US soldiers).
Pro-active defence» in military jargon, means preventive war.
When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it.
Bush also proclaimed openly his adherence to a doctrine of preventive war.
Preventive war and regime change through military intervention can never be taken off the table completely, but they have to be understood as very extreme measures.
George W. Bush had already invoked a'preventive war' against terrorism.
The events of that day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course andbecome strong proponents of a preventive war.
Irving commented that in light of the"preventive war" that he felt Hitler was forced to wage, the Kommissarbefehl was merely something that Stalin forced on Hitler.
But if you don't like that outcome,there's always option three: preventive war.
Acheson argued that the United States had the right of preventive war against a mere challenge to our position and prestige, not even a threat to our existence.
The events of that tragic day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course andbecome strong proponents of a preventive war to topple Saddam.
These fears may breed nationalism,patriotism, preventive wars and repressive anti-terrorist legislation, but in the end it's just excessive state power.
Iran and the US would hardly be allies if the lobby did not exist butUS policy would be more temperate and preventive war would not be a serious option.
In compliance with this doctrine, the US preserved the right to wage preventive wars on foreign soil to overthrow dictatorial regimes if they compromised the security of the US or its allies.
Concerning the latter, there is no bright line, but there is a distinction to be drawn, however imprecisely,between pre-emptive war and preventive war.
Post-9/11 US foreign policy rests on three main pillars: a doctrine of unrivaled military supremacy,the concept of preemptive or preventive war, and a willingness to act unilaterally if multilateral cooperation cannot be achieved.
The new doctrine was not one of preemptive war, which arguably falls within some stretching of the U.N. Charter, but rather of something that doesn't even begin to have any grounds in international law,namely, preventive war.
Irving's book faulted the Allied leaders, most notably Winston Churchill, for the eventual escalation of war, andclaimed that the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 was a"preventive war" forced on Hitler to avert an alleged impending Soviet attacksupported by some, notably Soviet GRU defector Victor Suvorov.
They also highlighted that Bush's doctrine of pre-emptive strikes itself was illegal, saying that,"In 1946, the Nuremberg Tribunal rejected Germanarguments of the necessity for preemptive attacks against its neighbors and instead outlawed preventive war as a crime against the peace.
The Bush Doctrine as explained in The National Security Strategy of the United States asserts that U.S. foreign policy rests on three main pillars: a doctrine of unrivaled military supremacy,the concepts of preemptive and preventive war, and a willingness to act unilaterally if multilateral cooperation cannot be achieved.
In 1946, the Nuremberg Tribunal rejected Germanarguments of the necessity for preemptive attacks against its neighbors and instead outlawed preventive war as a crime against the peace.
Their plan for a super world government by the three blocs(effectively dominated by the United States) would relegate all vestiges of international law to the dustbin,legitimize preventive war and nuclear weapons andorganize systematic manipulation of public opinion.