Примери за използване на Private premises на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Right of access to private premises.
Violation of private premises was the most serious offense.
For a child aged five to 16 to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
(a) encourage owners of public and private premises to carry out a domestic distribution risk assessment;
Order via Internet an alarm system for your office,home, private premises, etc.
The police entered the private premises and seized the banner without any court warrant and using methods that were unedifying even by their own standards.
For a child aged 5 to 16 to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
The power to enter private premises in order to seize documents in any form is highly intrusive and interferes with the right of privacy.
It's illegal for children under five to drink alcohol at home or on a private premises.
The Strasbourg Court has, in fact, consistently held that an interference with the right to inviolability of private premises is justifiable, inter alia, where legislation provides for‘safeguards against abuses' on the part of the public authorities.
It is not illegal for a child aged 5 to 16 to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
(b) inform consumers andowners of public and private premises about measures to eliminate or reduce the risk of non-compliance with the quality standards for water intended for human consumption due to the domestic distribution system;
Children aged five to 16 are legally allowed to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
The EDPS appreciates that the text qualifies the powers of the competent authorities by requiring as conditions to enter private premises the reasonable suspicion of a breach to the proposed Regulation or Directive and the prior authorisation from a judicial authority.
In the U.K., it is legal for kids over 5 years old to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
By the first ground of appeal, the appellants submit that the General Court misinterpreted andmisapplied the fundamental right to the inviolability of private premises, as protected by Article 7 of the Charter and Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms(‘the ECHR').
For example it is not illegal for a child aged 5- 16 years to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
(Appeal- Articles 20(4) and 28 of Council Regulation(EC) No 1/2003- Commission's powers of inspection- Fundamental right to the inviolability of private premises- Fundamental right to effective judicial review- Dow Benelux case-law- Burden of proof- Consequences of illegal searches made by the Commission).
According to UK law, it is legal for children aged five and over to drink alcohol at home or on other private premises.
Article 17.2(e) requires that access to private premises is submitted to prior authorization from the judicial authority in accordance with national law and to the existence of reasonable suspicion that documents related to the subject-matter of the inspection may be relevant to prove a case of insider dealing or market manipulation.
Recital 30 of the proposed Regulation specifies cases where access to private premises is necessary, i.e.
The activity of cleaning companies is a set of measures aimed at cleaning andmaintaining cleanliness in commercial and private premises.
That being so,that court rejected the plea put forward at first instance alleging infringement of the right to the inviolability of private premises by reason of the lack of prior judicial authorisation of the Commission's inspections.
The new broadcasting platforms permit the production andsharing of content by private individuals in private premises.
It is not clear whether these inspections would be limited to business premises of a trade repository or also apply to private premises or holdings of natural persons.
The EDPS notes that according to Article 17(3) this power shall be exercised in accordance with national law without explicitly referringto prior judicial authorisation, as is the case with regard to the power to enter private premises.
The Commission, supported by ESA and the Spanish Government,retorts that the General Court had correctly assessed the compatibility of the contested decisions with the fundamental right to the inviolability of private premises and had not misinterpreted the case-law of the ECHR in that connection.
In conclusion, the circumvention of the provisions laid down in Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 did not give rise only to a breach of the appellants'rights of defence but also, more importantly, to a manifest breach of the right to the inviolability of private premises.
The first ground of appeal raises, in substance, the issue of whether the current EU system of inspections under Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 is compatible with respect for the fundamental right to the inviolability of private premises, as enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter and Article 8 of the ECHR.
Vinyl wallpaper does not let in air, which can cause the development of mold under them, butdesigners are happy to use them in the design of public and private premises.