Примери за използване на Starting amount на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This is just a small fraction of what the starting amount will depend on.
The starting amount of the fines for the other undertakings was then determined.
To use it,you will need to make a starting amount- 20% of the cost of housing.
Those starting amounts were calculated on the basis of a starting amount for the first category of EUR 20 million(recitals 201 and 202 to the Decision).
Direct sales, sales of pictures and promotion of its services starting amount is not limited.
In those circumstances, the starting amount of Hoechst's fine is increased by 100% to EUR 40 million.
In doing so, the Court considered that the market share differentiations of 2% constituted sufficient ground to annul the Commission's initial decisions relating to the division into categories and the starting amount of the fines.
The Commission concludes that the starting amount must be increased by 175%(recital 361 to the Decision).
In that regard, it follows from recital 352 et seq. to the Decision that, on account of Hoechst's position on the market,the Commission began with that undertaking when it calculated the starting amount of the fines for each undertaking.
High volatility makes it possible to multiply the starting amount several times under the right handling.
Likewise, the fact that the starting amount was increased on account of the size of the Hoechst group does not prevent the basic amount from being increased on account of repeated infringement.
If this is not true, the ratio of 14 C to 12 C is not a constant,which would acrbon knowing the starting amount of 14 C in a specimen difficult or impossible to accurately determine.
It is therefore immaterial that the starting amount of the fine for the undertakings in the second category was not adapted in precise proportion to the market shares of the undertakings concerned.
That failure to state reasons must be analysed, in Hoechst's submission, by reference to recital 352 to the Decision,which deals with the classification of the undertakings concerned in different categories for the purposes of determining the starting amount of the fine.
In order to take account of Hoechst's‘size andoverall resources', the starting amount of its fine was increased by 100% to EUR 40 million(recital 357 to the Decision).
In those circumstances, the starting amount of EUR 12.9 million, determined by the Commission for the gravity of the infringement(see paragraph 15 above), must be increased by 45% to reflect the duration of the infringement of approximately four and a half years(from 14 March 1994 until 30 September 1998).
First, recital 352 to the Decision contains factorswhich enabled the Commission to place the undertakings concerned in two categories, in the context of the determination of the starting amount of the fines, on the basis of the gravity of the infringement.
In that decision, the Commission, inter alia, fixed fines with a starting amount of EUR 20 million for an undertaking with a market share of between 30 and 40% and at EUR 14 million for an undertaking with a market share of between 21 and 27%.
In the light of those principles, Hoechst contends that its basic amount in the present case ought to have been much lower(EUR 24.75 million or EUR 29.7 million,depending on whether the starting amount was EUR 14 million or EUR 15 million, all other things being equal).
For the purpose of determining the starting amount of the fines, the Commission stated that it would apply differential treatment to the companies involved in order to take account of differences in their effective economic capacity to cause significant damage to competition.
In particular, the fact that Hoechst is part of a group has already been taken into account twice by the Commission:first when the Commission fixed the starting amount of the fine at EUR 20 million and second when it increased that amount by 100% on account of the size of the Hoechst group.
The Commission increased each applicant's starting amount, as determined after the application of the deterrence factors, by 10% for each full year of the infringement and 5% for each additional period of six months or more but less than one year.
Furthermore, referring to CMA CGM and Others v Commission, paragraph 220 above(paragraph 405 et seq.), Hoechst asserts that the division ofthe undertakings into categories, in the context of the calculation of the starting amount, should first and foremost observe the principle of equal treatment.
Third, at recital 355 to the Decision, the Commission fixes the starting amount of the fines at EUR 20 million for the undertakings in the first group(Hoechst) and at EUR 6.66 million for the undertakings in the second group(Daicel, Chisso, Nippon Synthetic and Ueno).
Last, in order to ensure that the fine has a sufficient deterrent effect on large undertakings and to take account of the fact that large undertakings have legal and economic knowledge and infrastructures which enable them more easily to recognise that their conduct constitutes an infringement and to be aware of the consequences stemming from that conduct under competition law,the Commission makes a further adjustment to the starting amount of Hoechst's fine.
At recital 357 to the Decision, the Commission observes, in that regard, that the starting amount of the fine, calculated on the basis of the criterion of relative importance in the market concerned, should be increased to take account of the‘size and overall importance' of the undertaking.
In that case, the actual impact of the infringement is only one among a number of factors which, if it can be measured,may allow the Commission to increase the starting amount of the fine beyond the minimum likely amount of EUR 20 million(Case C-534/07 P Prym and Prym Consumer v Commission[2009] ECR I-7415, paragraph 75).
Last, the Commission emphasises that the specific starting amount is merely an intermediate amount which, when the method defined by the Guidelines is applied, is then adapted to reflect the duration of the infringement and any aggravating or attenuating circumstances(Cheil Jedang Corporation v Commission, paragraph 318 above, paragraph 95).
As regards the objection alleging miscalculation of the increase,the Commission contends that BASF is confusing the starting amount(see paragraph 15 above) with the basic amount of the fine as determined by reference to the gravity and duration of the infringement(see paragraph 17 above).
As a trader, you have the options to join any of the four accounts on offer and if the starting amount of a minimum deposit for a silver account of $1000 is a bit too high a risk to start with then the non-premium account of $250,00 will probably be more appropriate.