Примери за използване на Such destruction на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
What caused such destruction?
Such destruction will serve no purpose.
What had caused such destruction?
Such destruction that your father won't be able to sleep.
But if not,what other weapon could have caused such destruction?
Such destruction means, in the first place, opposing God‘s commands.
I visited it earlier in the year andhave never seen such destruction.
No one man could be responsible for such destruction, least of all Captain America.
Especially such destruction becomes noticeable at different heights of flooring materials.
One of the most significant instances in which fire is believed to have caused such destruction is the situation at Knossos in Crete.
Such destruction is not new to Man, as you will recall that your civilisation has twice before been destroyed.
A nuclear weapon is one of the few things that could conceivably cause such destruction, but the atom bomb hadn't even been invented yet.
Such destruction creates the breeding grounds for more violent extremism, thus continuing the vicious circle of violence propagating further violence.
To destroy or seize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure is imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.
CERN scientists disagree, saying that if monopoles exist,there's no reason to fear that such particles would cause such destruction.
Destroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict;
ETs will not undertake lifesaving relocations of people from some places on the planet to others prior to massive destruction because such destruction will not occur.
As long as the earth was involved in progressive evolution, no such destruction took place, for the great achievements of electricity can only serve a decaying earth….
Article 23(g) of the 1907 Hague Regulations affirms a well-established international law principle that it's"especially forbidden(to) destroy orseize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.".
Possibility of such destruction is guaranteed by that socialism will shorten the working day, will raise the masses to a new life and to put the majority of the population under the impressive all, without exception, to play“functions” policy, which leads to the demise total of any state at alll.
(b) to cause extensive destruction of such place, facility or system,where such destruction results in, or is likely to result in, major economic loss.”.
Perhaps the most important statement made by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in this context is that he would not have captured the two soldiers at that time if he knew it would lead to a war that would leave such destruction and victims in Lebanon.
With the intent to cause extensive damage to, or destruction of such a place, facility or system,where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.
When the causes are analyzed, eliminated and it remains only to destroy the red brotherhood, who has already inhabited the apartment and confidently processing the contents of the bin, it is necessary to choose the right andeffective way of such destruction.
Article 23 of The Hague Convention provides that:'it forbidden to destroy orseize the enemy's property,'unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war'.
Under Article 23(g) of the 1907 Hague Regulations, it is especially forbidden“to destroy orseize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war”.
Article 23 of The Hague Regulations of 1907 expressly forbids an occupying power‘to destroy orseize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war'.
For instance, Article 23(g) of the Hague Regulations of 1907 states that it is forbidden“to destroy orseize the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.”.
Article 23 of the 1907 Hague Regulations stipulates that it is‘especially forbidden' to“destroy or to seize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.”.
Article 23 of The Hague Convention of 1907 clearly states that,“it is especially forbidden(for the occupier) to destroy orseize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.”.