Примери за използване на Testable state на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Let's take a testable state.
The testable state is something real.
This is useful information obtained from the value of a testable state at a past moment.
A testable state is the result of an experiment.
Definition: An immediately testable state is one of the following.
So a testable state must fully involve the future.
Below we will give additional requirements to the condition and the conclusion of a testable state.
We want for each testable state to assign a signal.
Definition: A prerequisite for an axiom will be the difference between the axiom and the small testable state it describes.
Definition: A testable state will consist of two statements.
We will say that the theory is complete if,whenever the signal of the testable state is‘Yes' the theory says‘Yes'.
If a testable state is a positive axiom, there is nothing to describe it.
We get a red circle that describes the histories for which our theory says that the testable state is true at the moment t.
That is, the new testable state will be a more common case of the old taken for step t+1.
That is, if between two checks, none of these events has occurred,we can assume that the value of the testable state has not changed.
The testable state is something quite real, as the input we get at every step is real.
It is better not to take the probability of the conclusion butthe probability of the small testable state(the one this axiom will describe).
That is, the incorrect move is testable state, whose condition is a cumulative move(at the moment t+1).
This is testable state that, if it can be tested, the test will be carried out at the next step.
If we shift further to the right(e.g. by one more step),we will get another testable state, but it will be a prediction of more distant future.
In the definition of a testable state we can assume that the precondition and the postcondition are not conjunctions but cumulative conjunctions.
Every theory gives us some predictions about the value of the testable state, and this prediction has some degree of confidence.
So this new testable state will be a truth if the old testable state is a truth at step t+1 whatever happened at step t+1.
From each positive axiom we will make a theory that describes the small testable state and says it is true always under certain circumstances.
A testable state, whose condition is a conjunction, in which all literals are for the moment t+1, and the conclusion would be a literal from the input, also for the moment t+1.
From the statistics we will find axioms that are a special case of this testable state, and we will use these axioms to describe this testable state.
If the condition of the testable state is a common conjuncture, then we know how many steps this experiment takes, but if it is a cumulative conjunction, we do not know even that.
If these are cumulative conjunctions,then all possible developments can be infinite, but a testable state still will be a well-defined function, although this function may not be computable.
More precisely- the value of the testable state according to the relevant theory, because we will not know the exact value of these states, and will approximate them with some theories.
That is, we quite naturally get that the testable state that looks ahead to the future, is a more general case of the one that looks closer.