Примери за използване на To inhuman or degrading на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
It should also be noted that Article 19(2) of the Charter states, inter alia, that no one may be removed to a State where there is a seriousrisk that he or she would be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
The same conclusion can be drawn as regards the application of Article 19(2) of the Charter,which provides that no one may be removed to a State where there is a serious risk that he would be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
It reads:“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”[back].
Those very exceptional cases are characterised by the seriousness andirreparable nature of the harm that may be caused by the removal of a third country national to a country in which there is a serious risk that he will be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
For example, prisoners may not be ill-treated, subjected to inhuman or degrading punishment or conditions contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.
The European Convention on Human Rights guarantees that no one shall be subject to inhuman or degrading treatment.
For example, prisoners may not be ill-treated,subjected to inhuman or degrading punishment or conditions contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.
The UN Human Rights Committee finds that a deportation of two Syrians to Bulgaria would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
It thus held that an asylum seeker would run a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, within the meaning of that article, in the event of a transfer to a Member State in which there are substantial grounds for believing that there are systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the conditions for the reception of applicants.
Under Article 4 of the Charter,‘[n]o one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'.
It thus held that an asylum seeker would run a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, within the meaning of that article, in the event of a transfer to a Member State in which there are substantial grounds for believing that there are systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the conditions for the reception of applicants.
(b) who makes a plausible case that he has good grounds for believing that if he is expelled he will run a real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
In this Opinion I shall argue that a third country national who, if returned to his country of origin,would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment because of the state of his health and the lack of appropriate medical treatment in that country, falls outside the scope of Article 2(e) of that directive.
Those very exceptional cases were characterised, in the CJEU's view, by the seriousness and the irreparable nature of the harm that might be caused by the removal of a third-country national to a country in which there was a seriousrisk that he or she would be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
(a) if the third-country national or the stateless person runs the real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or the death penalty or of persecution because of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political conviction in the State of destination or another State of transit; or.
According to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights states that'' No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.''.
By its first question, the referring court is asking, in essence, whether a third country national who suffers from a serious illness and who, if returned to his country of origin,would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment due to the lack of appropriate medical treatment in his or her country should be regarded as a‘ person eligible for subsidiary protection' within the meaning of Article 2( e) of Directive 2004/83.
Indeed,‘the mere existence of… deficiencies, which may be systemic or generalised, or which may affect certain groups of people, or which may affect certain places of detention,… does not necessarily imply that, in a specific case,the individual concerned will be subject to inhuman or degrading treatment in the event that he is surrendered'.
The Court ruled that the Member states may not transfer an asylum seeker to the Member State responsible, where they cannot be unaware that systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure andin the reception conditions amount to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
It builds on Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights which provides that“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”.
In today's judgment, the Court recalls, first of all, that a Member State is required not to transfer an asylum seeker to the Member State initially identified as responsible where systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure andin the conditions for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member State initially identified as responsible provide substantial grounds for believing that the applicant would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment2.
Everyone has the rigt to life and to physical andmoral integrity, and may under no circumstances be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.
The absolute ban on torture and ill-treatment enshrined in core United Nations human rights conventions is reflected at the EU level in the Charter of Fundamental Rights,which states that‘no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'.
The Court of Justice further held that Member States may not transfer an asylum seeker where“they cannot be unaware that systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure andin the reception conditions of asylum seekers… amount to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment” within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(17) The Court concluded that Member States are required not to transfer an applicant to the Member State responsible where they‘cannot be unaware that systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure andin the reception conditions of asylum seekers in that Member State amount to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter'.
Migrants entering a transit or destination country without the necessary documents(or losing their legal status later) may be detained for a prolonged period of timeif caught by authorities, and be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, without access to legal assistance.
His conclusion was that Article 2(e) of the Directive 2004/83/EC must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from regarding as a‘person eligible for subsidiary protection' a third country national suffering from a serious illness who,if returned to his country of origin, would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment because of the lack of appropriate medical treatment in his country.
In light of the foregoing, I therefore consider that Article 2( e) of Directive 2004/83 must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from regarding as a‘ person eligible for subsidiary protection' a third country national suffering from a serious illness who,if returned to his country of origin, would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment because of the lack of appropriate medical treatment in his country.