Примери за използване на To remove information на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
- 
                        Official
                    
 - 
                        Colloquial
                    
 - 
                        Medicine
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Computer
                    
 
How to remove information where to  be introduced?
Under the“right to  be forgotten” ruling, EU citizens may ask search engines to remove information about them.
There is no possible way to remove information from the site altogether.
Submit a claim with an indication of the actual andregulatory grounds that enable the Administration to remove information from public access.
Our legal obligation to remove information or to  block the use of information  remain unaffected.
                Хората също превеждат
            
Shop has the right, but not the obligation,to  withhold access to information  or to remove information from this website if, in Safe.
Legal obligations to remove information or to  block the usage of information  remain unchallenged.
The Transparency Report provides data on the requests we receive from copyright owners and governments to remove information from our services.
The best way to remove information about yourself in Google's search results is to  contact the website owner who published the information. .
The CHMP had the opportunity to  provide comments namely,the CHMP requested the MAH to remove information regarding fatal dose as this is not in line with the SmPC guideline.
Ordering a host provider to remove information covered by the injunction or to  block worldwide access within the framework of the relevant international law.
This legislation grants authorities the power to  block/censor websites if they fail to  comply with requests to remove information the state finds inaccurate.
Administrators also have the right to remove information on its own motion or following a signal from other users for information  detrimental to  their image and dignity.
The second draft law would give authorities the power to  block websites if they fail to  comply with requests to remove information that the state deems to  be factually inaccurate.
In conclusion, Member States may order a host provider to remove information covered by the injunction or to  block access to  that information  worldwide within the framework of the relevant international law.
The second draft law would give the government authorities the power to  block websites which fail to  comply with requests to remove information that the state has said is factually inaccurate.
Ordering a host provider to remove information  covered by the injunction or to  block access to  that information worldwide within the framework of the relevant international law.
The Transparency Report provides data on the requests we receive from copyright owners and governments to remove information from our services.
To remove information covered by the injunction or to  block access to that information  worldwide within the framework of the relevant international law, and it is up to  Member States to  take that law into account.
The“right to  be forgotten” is a legal precedent set by the European Court of Justice in 2014,following a case brought by Spaniard Mario Costeja Gonzalez who asked Google to remove information about his financial history.
Order host providers to remove information which it stores, the content of which is equivalent to  the content of information  which was previously declared to  be illegal, or to  block access to  that information,  and.
The applicant and the Austrian, Latvian, Portuguese and Finnish Governments maintain, in essence, that Article 15(1)of Directive 2000/31 does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove information having content equivalent to  that held to  be illegal, where it has become aware of that information. .
To remove information which it stores, the content of which is identical to  the content of information  which was previously declared to  be unlawful, or to  block access to that information,  irrespective of who requested the storage of that information; .
Since the Directive does not regulate the territorial scope of an obligation to remove information disseminated via a social network platform, it does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove information  disseminated worldwide.
(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I shall confine myself to  asking the High Representative, Baroness Ashton, to  place a specific request on the agenda of our relations with Egypt:we call on the Egyptian authorities to remove information on religion from official documents, identity cards, passports and all documents needed to  obtain work.
As the E-Commerce Directive did not regulate the territorial scope of an obligation to remove information disseminated via a social network, it did not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove  such information  worldwide, Szpunar concluded.
For the purpose of the foregoing, the Administration reserves the right to remove information provided on the Site and to  make technical and legal measures to  terminate access to  the Internet portal of the User(the Customer), which create problems in using the Internet portal to  other Users(Customers) or Users(Customers) who violate requirements of the Agreement.
In the second place, the referring court asks, in essence,whether Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31 precludes a court of a Member State from ordering a host provider to remove information which it stores, the content of which is equivalent to  the content of information  which was previously declared to  be illegal, or to  block access to  that information. .
In the AG's view,the Directive does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove information‘equivalent' to  the information  characterised as illegal, provided it has been made aware of that equivalent information  by the person concerned, third parties or another source, as in that case, the removal obligation does not entail general monitoring of information  stored.
The AG also considered that since the Directive does not regulate the territorial scope of an obligation to remove information disseminated via a social network platform, it does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove  such information  on a worldwide basis.