Примери за използване на Transfer procedure на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Then come back two to six days later for the embryo transfer procedure.
The domain transfer procedure(change of Registrant) usually takes up to 5 business days.
You will go back anywhere between two days andsix days later for the embryo transfer procedure.
After both confirmations are received the transfer procedure usually takes up to 2 business days.
(4) The Provider shall notify the User about the successful completion of the domain name transfer procedure.
The policy affects not only the domain transfer procedure but regular changes to the contact information as well.
The transfer procedure provided for in Articles 23, 158 and 160(2) shall apply for the first time to the appropriations for the budgetary year 2004.
If there have not been changes on the domain's DNS settings, the domain transfer procedure goes unnoticed- there are no interruptions or shut downs.
New developments in fertility lab technology have made it easier to bring embryos to the blastocyst stage before the transfer procedure.
For the new Registrant the transfer procedure is the same as with the registration procedure for a new. bg domain name.
After transfer initiation,you may monitor transfer status throughout the period of transfer procedure in your customer profile.
Firstly, the transfer procedure: abolishing the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenses requires the adoption of a single procedure, putting the two budgetary authorities on an equal footing, without compromising the flexibility that must be shown by the European Commission when managing the budget.
The entity receiving the personal data must comply with the principles of personal data processing set forth in Cross-Border Data Transfer Procedure.
If there have notbeen changes on the domain's DNS settings, the domain transfer procedure goes unnoticed- there are no interruptions or shut downs.
To complete the domain transfer successfully, the User must have access to the domain's management page to remove locks andchange privacy settings to prepare the domain for the transfer procedure.
Furthermore, Article 28(2)of the Dublin III Regulation permits the detention of a person in order to secure transfer procedures pursuant to that regulation only where there is a significant risk of absconding, the assessment of which must be based on an individual assessment.
Significant risk of absconding is defined at Article 2(n) of Dublin III Regulation(Article 2(n)) as‘the existence of reasons in an individual case, which are based on objective criteria defined by law, to believe that an applicant or a third-country national ora stateless person who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond'.
As regards the detention conditions andthe guarantees applicable to persons detained, in order to secure the transfer procedures to the Member State responsible, Articles 9, 10 and 11 of Directive 2013/33/EU shall apply.
The Member State responsible shall be informed without delay of any postponement due either to an appeal or review procedure with suspensive effect, or physical reasons such as ill health of the asylum seeker, non-availability of transport orthe fact that the asylum seeker has withdrawn from the transfer procedure.
As regards the detention conditions, which shall fully respect the person's fundamental rights, andthe guarantees applicable to persons detained, in order to secure the transfer procedures to the Member State responsible, Articles 9, 10 and 11 of Directive 2013/33/EU shall apply.
If that is the case‘Member States may detain the person concerned in order to secure transfer procedures in accordance with' the Dublin rules,‘on the basis of an individual assessment and only in so far as detention is proportional and other less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively'.
Consequently, the answer to the question referred is that Article 2(n) and Article 28(2) of the Dublin III Regulation, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to establish, in a binding provision of general application,objective criteria underlying the reasons for believing that an applicant who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond.
In the cases where there is the risk of absconding,Member States may detain the person concerned in order to secure transfer procedures, on the basis of an individual assessment and only in so far as detention is proportional and other less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively.
When there is a significant risk of absconding,Member States may detain the person concerned in order to secure transfer procedures in accordance with this Regulation, on the basis of an individual assessment and only in so far as detention is proportional and other less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively.
It should be noted at the outset that the Dublin III Regulation, pursuant to Article 28(2) thereof,permits the detention of applicants, in order to secure transfer procedures in accordance with that regulation, when there is a significant risk of absconding on the basis of an individual assessment, and only in so far as the detention is proportional and where other less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively.
(4) Can the discretionary clause under Article 17(1) of the Dublin III Regulation be used as a basis permitting an applicant for international protection,or another person, in a transfer procedure under that regulation, to make a claim that that provision should be applied, which the competent authorities and courts and tribunals of the Member State must assess, or are those administrative authorities and courts and tribunals required to establish the circumstances cited of their own motion?'.
When there is a proven significant risk of absconding, Member States may, as a measure of last resort,detain the person concerned in order to secure transfer procedures in accordance with this Regulation, on the basis of an individual assessment and only in so far as detention is proportional and other less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively, based on an individual assessment of the applicant's circumstances.
Can the discretionary clause under Article 17(1) of the Dublin III Regulation be used as a basis permitting an applicant for international protection,or another person, in a transfer procedure under that regulation, to make a claim that that provision should be applied, which the competent authorities and courts and tribunals of the Member State must assess, or are those administrative authorities and courts and tribunals required to establish the circumstances cited of their own motion?