Примери за използване на Treatment of third-country nationals на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Fair treatment of third-country nationals.
The EIF is part of the common immigration policy which aims at ensuring efficient management of migration flows and fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in the Member States.
Fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in the territory of its Member States.
(FR) The European Union, a symbol of human rights around the world, must guarantee fair treatment of third-country nationals residing in its territory and establish an inclusive policy towards them.
The fair treatment of third-country nationals covered by this Directive should be ensured in accordance with Article 79 TFEU.
The EIF is part of the common immigration policy(Article 79 points 1 and 2 TFEU),which aims at ensuring efficient management of migration flows and fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in the Member States.
The fair and equal treatment of third-country nationals;
Fair treatment of third-country nationals who reside legally on the territory of the Member States should be ensured, with the aim of approximating their legal status to that of EU nationals. .
Supporting a common visa policy to facilitate legitimate travel, provide a high quality of service to visa applicants,ensure equal treatment of third-country nationals and tackle illegal immigration;
The need to develop specific integration policies(based on fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in the Union, the prevention of social exclusion, racism and xenophobia and the respect for diversity).
The TFEU provides that the Union is to develop a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring, at all stages,the efficient management of migration flows and fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States.
This common immigration policy ensures the“efficient management of migration flows,fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States, and the prevention of, and enhanced measures to combat, illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings.”.
Article 79 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union(TFEU)entrusts the EU with the task of developing a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring efficient management of migration flows and fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in the Member States.
The Union shall develop a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring, at all stages, the efficient management of migration flows,fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States, and the prevention of, and enhanced measures to combat, illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings.
Border controls, asylum and immigration- Asylum policy- Refugee status or subsidiary protection status- Directive 2011/95- Freedomof movement within a Member State- Scope- Freedom to travel and to choose the place of residence- National rules imposing a residence condition on beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status in receipt of certain specific social security benefits- Justification- Integration of third-country nationals in the Member State concerned- Lawfulness- Conditions- Equal treatment of third-country nationals in a comparable situation.
In this context, it stated in particular that the European Union should ensure fair treatment of third-country nationals who are legally residing in the territory of the Member States and that a more vigorous integration policy should aim to grant them rights and obligations comparable to those of citizens of the Union.
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, asserts:“The Union shall develop a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring, at all stages, the efficient management of migration flows,fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States, and the prevention of, and enhanced measures to combat, illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings”.
The Tampere European Council in 1999 concluded that the EU‘must ensure fair treatment of third-country nationals who reside legally on the territory of its Member States', calling for a‘more vigorous integration policy' to grant rights and obligations to third-country nationals comparable with those of EU citizens.
Article 3(2) of the Directive states that it does not cover difference of treatment based on nationality and is without prejudice to provisions and conditions relating to the entry into and residence of third-country nationals and stateless persons on the territory of Member States, and to any treatment which arises from the legal status of third‑country nationals or stateless persons.
This prohibition of discrimination should also apply to nationals of third countries, butdoes not cover differences of treatment based on nationality and is without prejudice to provisions governing the entry and residence of third-country nationals and their access to employment and to occupation.
This Directive does not cover difference of treatment based on nationality and is without prejudice to provisions and conditions relating to the entry into and residence of third-country nationals and stateless persons on the territory of Member States, and to any treatment which arises from the legal status of the third-country nationals and stateless persons concerned.
Within two years of the date of entry into force of this Directive, EBA shall submit a report to the the European Parliament,the Council and the Commission on the treatment of third-country branches under the relevant national law of Member States.
Indeed, in the judgment the Court of Justice declared that it was necessary to observe the rights laid down in Article 34 of the Charter when determining the social security,social assistance and social protection measures subject to the principle of equal treatment enshrined in Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.(26).
This prohibition of discrimination should also apply to nationals of third countries, but does not cover differences of treatment based on nationality and is without prejudice to provisions governing the entry and residence of third-country nationals and their access to employment and to occupation.
(42a) Specific safeguards governing the treatment of personal data of vulnerable third-country nationals, such as children, should be required.
The adoption of this legislation constitutes a major step in ensuring equal treatment to third-country nationals across the territory of the EU.
This recommendation by Parliament proposes to approve the regulation offered by the Council and not to delay any further because the new regulation would simplify the administration of procedures andwould guarantee the equal treatment of legally resident third-country nationals in the field of social security.
We are convinced of the need to ensure greater certainty regarding their legal situation in the EU, avoiding all possible differential treatment vis-à-vis other third-country nationals.
After finding that the mechanism for allocating the funds led to a difference in treatment between the two categories, the Court of Justice looked into whether it fell within the scope of Article 11(1)(d), which provides for equal treatment between EU citizens and third-country nationals who are long-term residents with respect to‘social security, social assistance and social protection as defined by national law'.
Once the scope of Article 33 of Directive 2011/95 has been established, it is not difficult to answer the question whether the condition relating to establishing residence in a specific place constitutes in itself a restriction of freedom of movement as laid down in that provision,irrespective, at this stage, of whether that measure also satisfies the requirement that there should be equal treatment with other third-country nationals who are legally resident, which will be examined in my assessment of the third question.