Примери за използване на Where member states have на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The above-mentioned recommendations will be discussed in the Council where Member States have until early July to vote on the final recommendations.
Where Member States have defined a‘minimum maintenance activity' on land not used for production, its performance is unlikely to be verifiable in the LPIS.
I do not agree that we should adopt decisions at a European level on issues where Member States have differing attitudes stemming from their Christian traditions.
Where Member States have chosen to rely on mediation, the notification to the Commission shall at least include, when available, the source where relevant information on the mediators entrusted can be found.
In addition, the possibility of providing estimates was included,enabling gaps to be filled in cases where Member States have not submitted their data on time.
Some minor changes were negotiated where Member States have strong objections but the intention was to keep as closely as possible to a standard operating procedure.
The obligations referred to in the first subparagraph shall be reviewed by the Member States at the latest within one year of 25 May 2011, except where Member States have carried out such a review within the previous two years.
Whereas further clarification is needed,especially in those cases where Member States have announced the introduction of new forms of professional regulation after the completion of the exercise;
Where Member States have more than one competent authority for the prudential supervision of credit institutions and financial institutions, Member States shall take the requisite measures to organise coordination between such authorities.
The lack of national solidarity has been reflected at European level, where Member States have seized every opportunity to water down the social agenda for Europe.
Where Member States have implemented the deployment of smart metering systems, regulatory authorities may introduce time differentiated network tariffs, reflecting the use of the network, in a transparent and foreseeable way for the consumer.
As a matter of priority, the Commission will investigate cases where Member States have failed to communicate transposition measures or where those measures have incorrectly transposed directives;
The obligations referred to in the first▌paragraph shall be reviewed by the Member States at the latest within one year of date of entry into force of this Directive, except where Member States have carried out such a review within the previous four years.
Units of administration,dividing areas where Member States have and/or exercise jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance, separated by administrative… data. gov. uk| July 1, 2017 HTML.
Encourages the Commission, in its forthcoming Communication on the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC, also to examine those areas where Member States have chosen to extend the measures of the Directive beyond its intended scope;
The Commission prioritises, among others,cases where Member States have failed to communicate transposition measures or where those measures have incorrectly transposed directives.
Without prejudice to Article 10,the withdrawal period referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall expire after 14 days or, in cases where Member States have adopted rules in accordance with paragraph 1a of this Article, 30 days from:';
Under new policy in cases where Member States have failed to transpose EU legislation into national law within the required deadline, the Commission can now ask for financial sanctions to be imposed at the first referral to Court.
The references to the withdrawal period of 14 days in the model instructions on withdrawal set out in Annex I(A)shall be replaced by references to a withdrawal period of 30 days in cases where Member States have adopted rules in accordance with Article 9(1a).';
The annual report should indicate the extent to which annual operational targets(where Member States have established such operational targets), and strategic objectives set out in the national control plan were achieved.
Where Member States have introduced information requirements over and above what is specified in Community law, on the basis of minimum clauses, the omission of that extra information will not constitute a misleading omission under this Directive.
The obligations referred to in the first subparagraph shall be reviewed by the Member States at the latest within one year of 25 May 2011, except where Member States have carried out such a review within the previous two years.
Where Member States have implemented the deployment of smart metering systems, competent regulatory authorities shall introduce time differentiated network tariffs, reflecting the use of the network, in a transparent and foreseeable and cost efficient way for the consumer.
However, geographical targeting can alsobe an effective tool, e.g. to prioritise areas where Member States have demonstrated that conversion to a less environmental friendly land use will occur without agri-environment support.
Where Member States have chosen, in accordance with paragraph 1, to lay down criminal sanctions for the infringements of the provisions referred to in Article 63 their competent authorities shall provide ESMA annually with anonymised and aggregated data regarding all criminal investigations undertaken and criminal penalties imposed.
Soros said the idea of a"multi-speed Europe" where all countries are moving to further integrationshould be abandoned and replaced with the idea of a"multi-track Europe" where member states have more choice over their political and economic direction.
Where Member States have chosen, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 67(1), to lay down criminal sanctions for infringements of this Regulation, their competent authorities shall on an annual basis provide EIOPA with anonymised and aggregated data regarding all criminal investigations undertaken and criminal sanctions imposed.
Underlines the importance of the principle of mutual recognition for ensuring market access to the single market for goods which are not harmonised at Union level,and in cases where Member States have national, very often different, rules on products, but with the same underlying objective;
Where Member States have chosen, in accordance with Article 38(1), to lay down criminal sanctions for the infringements of the provisions referred to in that paragraph, their competent authorities shall provide ESMA annually with anonymised and aggregated data regarding all criminal investigations undertaken and criminal sanctions imposed.
The new Regulation shall“establish clear procedures to ensure the free movement of goods lawfully marketed in another Member State andto ensure that free movement can be restricted only where Member States have legitimate public interest grounds for doing so and the restriction is proportionate.