Примери коришћења Darwinists на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
The Darwinists have no shame!
They are'social darwinists'.
Darwinists can no longer deceive anyone.
He exposed the wild assumptions made by the Darwinists to support their theory.
Aren't we all darwinists now, except for a few cranks like you?
That certainly wasn't what I was hearing from prominent darwinists like Richard Dawkins.
These were darwinists who were taken seriously by fellow academics.
Any creationists are liable to become victims of the same theorising as the Darwinists.
First and foremost, Darwinists need to account for what makes human beings human;
Any creationists are liable to become victims of the same theorising as the Darwinists.
During the mid and late 1800s plummeted a scientific battle between Darwinists and theologians about the theory of evolution.
In it, he criticized social Darwinists who claimed that society progressed through the survival of the fittest social institutions.
When she refused to take sides in an article she wrote about Intelligent Design, the darwinists found a new favorite target.
This logic explains why Darwinists are unperturbed by all the evidentiary problems that critics such as myself have identified.
Physicians who are aware of the history of 20th-century American medicine harbor some bad feelings towards darwinists Because of eugenics.
Therefore, all Darwinists who have become aware of the scourge that Darwinism truly is, of course have the opportunity to correct that terrible error they have devoted their lives, for as long as they live on this earth.
Hitler and many of the physicians that carried out this program were very fanatical darwinists and particularly wanted to apply darwinism to society.
That is what Darwinists do not wish to speak of and that inflicts total despair on them as they speak of the co-called evolution of man and try to impose a whole series of false skulls as evidence for this.
In fact, not only is there major opposition to these interpretations within the academic community, the Darwinists themselves do not entirely agree with each other on the details.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,for the last 150 years, Darwinists have been saying that God is unnecessary to explain man's existence and that evolution replaces God, but evolution only tells you what happens once you have life.
When they are faced with the devastating evidence against the Darwinian mechanism, andreminded of the lack of positive evidence in its favor, Darwinists tend to retreat to what they think is a more defensible line.
Moreover, in order to stress the similarity between humans and apes, Darwinists features an ape and make a great show of various forms of behavior and abilities such as the use of tools or the ability to learn.
When neurosurgeon Michael Egnor wrote an essay to high school students saying doctors didn't needto study evolution in order to practice medicine, the darwinists were quick to try and exterminate this new threat.
Another tip-off was the sharp contrast I noticed between the extremely dogmatic tone that Darwinists use when addressing the general public and the occasional frank acknowledgments, in scientific circles, of serious problems with the theory.
Darwinists can write as many deceptive books jam packed with formulae, produce as many false fossils as they like, make as many demagogic assaults on the scientific evidence for Creation as they choose or stick posters up full of fantastical illustrations and present these as exhibitions of evolution all over the place, but none of this will ever change the fact of their fundamental defeat.
An adequate theory of how evolution works is particularly indispensable when evolution is deemed to imply,as countless Darwinists have insisted, that purposeless material mechanisms are responsible for our existence.